Search for: "High v State"
Results 3581 - 3600
of 35,518
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
21 Mar 2011, 4:04 am
Court of Appeal (Criminal Division) Haddock, R v [2011] EWCA Crim 303 (07 February 2011) M, R v [2011] EWCA Crim 648 (18 March 2011) Takkar v R. [2011] EWCA Crim 646 (18 March 2011) Attorney Generals Reference No. 73, 75 & 03 of 2010 [2011] EWCA Crim 633 (03 March 2011) Court of Appeal (Civil Division) Tradegro (UK) Ltd v Wigmore Street Investments Ltd & Ors [2011] EWCA Civ 268 (16 March 2011) High Court (Queen’s Bench Division)… [read post]
22 Oct 2012, 1:04 pm
In this high-profile case that was decided by the Fifth Circuit on July 30, 2012 [See WIMS 8/1/12], the Appeals Court has ordered that the opinion previously filed in this case is withdrawn and a new opinion is substituted. [read post]
15 Mar 2012, 12:40 pm
Here's the abstract: In Lyng v. [read post]
24 Aug 2007, 4:51 pm
Bush (06-1195) and Al Odah v. [read post]
29 Nov 2012, 9:38 am
The case raises a strange issue of how to assess whether the damages are too high under state law.The case is Saladino v. [read post]
2 Aug 2022, 12:41 pm
Prior to Epic v. [read post]
6 Oct 2020, 2:49 am
According to the EU judges, the Commission should have proven that the profits at issue were taxable under Irish law, as interpreted by the Irish High Court8)Murphy (Inspector of Taxes) v. [read post]
13 Oct 2011, 12:46 pm
The state's principal evidence in its prosecution was a video recording from a motion-activated video camera installed in the high school. [read post]
11 Jun 2010, 4:05 am
The case arose in the context of two high profile cases — a murder case in Alberta and an Ontario case involving terrorism? [read post]
26 Jan 2010, 1:47 pm
Federal Way School District v. [read post]
27 Jun 2012, 12:24 pm
In his press release, Senator Toomey stated that “[a] number of recent high-profile data breaches combined with the messy patchwork of 46 different state laws highlight how difficult it is for consumers to know their personal information is secure,” adding that his bill would preempt state statutes and “eliminate the burden of complying with varying standards and laws. [read post]
11 Oct 2009, 7:50 am
State v. [read post]
8 Jun 2012, 8:06 am
V. [read post]
26 Apr 2020, 11:22 am
You can read the Supreme Court decision at Atlantic Richfield Co. v. [read post]
28 Nov 2012, 6:49 am
Supreme Court decided in Padilla v. [read post]
1 Nov 2011, 4:35 am
In “Pliva v. [read post]
8 Oct 2013, 8:00 am
United States Illinois Federal Judge Rules Railroad Employees Can File Suit If Employer Blocks Them from Getting Medical Treatment Following Work Injury; Rene Delgado v. [read post]
18 Dec 2019, 9:51 pm
See Kijowska v. [read post]
16 Jun 2018, 12:25 pm
In Nori Holdings v Bank Otkritie [2018] EWHC 1343 (Comm), Males J critically discussed (and openly disagreed with) AG Wathelet’s Opinion on Case C-536/13 Gazprom and confirmed that such injunctions continue to not be available where they would restrain proceedings in another EU Member State. [read post]
