Search for: "Husband (S) v. Wife (S)"
Results 3581 - 3600
of 6,209
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
3 Oct 2012, 1:13 pm
Lopes v. [read post]
3 Oct 2012, 7:54 am
The remaining two issues - whether the trial court abused its discretion when it failed to award spousal support to the husband, and whether any evidence supported the trial court's award of appellate attorney's fees to the wife - were not affected by the acceptance-of-benefits doctrine because they did not concern the division of the community estate. [read post]
3 Oct 2012, 7:54 am
The remaining two issues - whether the trial court abused its discretion when it failed to award spousal support to the husband, and whether any evidence supported the trial court's award of appellate attorney's fees to the wife - were not affected by the acceptance-of-benefits doctrine because they did not concern the division of the community estate. [read post]
1 Oct 2012, 7:15 am
The case is Wexler v. [read post]
1 Oct 2012, 4:00 am
The case is Gomez Lawn Service Inc. v. [read post]
28 Sep 2012, 12:04 am
When the criminal case registered at the instance of the wife was pending, the dispute between the husband and wife and their family members was settled. [read post]
26 Sep 2012, 7:54 am
Also, the ex-wife's listing of community assets and liabilities was accepted and conformed by the court as her ex-husband had not timely challenged her listing of same. [read post]
25 Sep 2012, 11:20 am
Cunningham v. [read post]
25 Sep 2012, 8:06 am
In the case of Mouncer, the husband and wife were on very bad terms and slept in separate bedrooms. [read post]
25 Sep 2012, 6:13 am
Merrill v. [read post]
24 Sep 2012, 4:12 am
Hess v. [read post]
22 Sep 2012, 5:23 am
The trial court, on remand, was to reconsider: (a) An award to Wife of her attorney fees and cost of appraisals; (b) Whether the imputation of income to Husband of $130,000 annually rather than his actual compensation of $240,000/year and wife was appropriate or whether the trial court's imputation of income to Husband of only $130,000 was appropriate to avoid "double-dipping" since Wife was awarded one-half of the value of the… [read post]
21 Sep 2012, 4:44 pm
Pasquariello absolute power over claims and litigation for her husband, including the authority to submit to arbitration, the 2nd District Court of Appeal said.Arbitration Agreement: KENTUCKY HIGH COURT INVALIDATES RESIDENT'S ARBITRATION AGREEMENT, Ping v. [read post]
18 Sep 2012, 5:04 pm
Just like the rule that a husband and a wife can't be arrested for the same crime, that's not the law. [read post]
18 Sep 2012, 7:41 am
The plaintiff (the driver’s wife) sued individually, and on behalf of her son and her husband’s estate. [read post]
12 Sep 2012, 2:32 pm
It’s just like Biggie v. [read post]
12 Sep 2012, 2:32 pm
It’s just like Biggie v. [read post]
12 Sep 2012, 7:20 am
In McCord v. [read post]
11 Sep 2012, 4:00 am
In Soleimani v. [read post]
10 Sep 2012, 4:13 pm
In Tennant v Hutton a similar question had arisen in respect of Schedule 1 Part 1 of the Rent Act 1977, where a husband and wife held a joint tenancy, with the daughter living with them. [read post]
