Search for: "In Re: White v." Results 3581 - 3600 of 4,485
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
13 Aug 2010, 4:49 pm by Colin O'Keefe
 Topics covered include the Lehman bankruptcy, performance bonds and Choice Healthcare v. [read post]
12 Aug 2010, 10:12 am by Steven G. Pearl
The present record thus indicates they consented to classwide arbitration and, in any event, the issue has been forfeited because it was not presented to the arbitrator and Judge White. ( Stolt-Nielsen S.A. v. [read post]
11 Aug 2010, 6:49 am by Adam Chandler
And finally, as JURIST notes, today marks the 218th anniversary of the Supreme Court’s first reported decision, Georgia v. [read post]
6 Aug 2010, 6:47 pm by Jeff Foust
In a speech Friday afternoon at the Thirteenth Annual International Mars Society Convention in Dayton, Ohio, former NASA administrator Mike Griffin offered a one-sentence summary of his opinion about the White House’s plans for NASA: “We’re not going anywhere and we’re going to spend a lot of money doing it. [read post]
6 Aug 2010, 10:07 am by Steven M. Gursten
The jury instruction on serious impairment of body function will need to be re-written after McCormick. [read post]
5 Aug 2010, 11:34 am by Joe Mullin
This was a big continent which the white people here thought of as "empty. [read post]
4 Aug 2010, 12:28 pm by Nathan
  (If you’re interested in learning ways to defend such cases, you can check out our “Hope for Hopeless Cases” CLE series, particularly lectures IV and V.) [read post]
3 Aug 2010, 11:07 am by Erin Miller
  That was a question that was left open in the Virginia Military Institute case [United States v. [read post]
26 Jul 2010, 9:08 am by Steven M. Taber
– Trading Markets.com, July 21, 2010 Consistent with Section 122 of the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act of 1980, as amended (“CERCLA”), 42 U.S.C. 9622(d), and 28 CFR 50.7, notice is hereby given that on July 16, 2010, the United States lodged a Consent Decree with 163 defendants (each of which is identified in the proposed Decree) in United States of America v. [read post]