Search for: "In The Matter Of: Jones" Results 3581 - 3600 of 6,018
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
26 May 2012, 8:19 am by Lawrence Taylor
It does not matter, of course, whether you are a man or a women: the laws do not discriminate. [read post]
25 May 2012, 6:51 am
The Kentucky personal injury attorneys at JONES WARD PLC have the litigation experience to handle these types of cases. [read post]
24 May 2012, 12:28 pm
To make matters worse, Bloomberg was 3rd entrant into a field dominated by Reuters and Telerate/Dow Jones. [read post]
24 May 2012, 8:37 am by Paralegal Mentor
  I recommend that if there is an area of law or subject matter that you don’t work in on a daily basis, take a course at your local community college or attend seminars and webinars on that subject. [read post]
23 May 2012, 7:58 pm by Charles Sartain
• A contract may preclude a valid fraudulent inducement claim if it clearly expresses the party’s intent to waive those claims, or disclaims reliance on representations about specific matters in dispute. [read post]
23 May 2012, 5:30 pm by Colin O'Keefe
Costa and Brian Gross of Cooley Manion Jones on the firm’s Defense Litigation Insider FTC v. [read post]
23 May 2012, 8:45 am by Paul Horwitz
Deborah Jones Merritt, along with her son, is guest-posting this week at Paul Campos's blog. [read post]
23 May 2012, 6:00 am by Georges Legrand
  However, he ultimately filed a lawsuit against his employer under the Jones Act and the General Maritime Law. [read post]
22 May 2012, 7:26 pm by FDABlog HPM
  As you may recall, in the Purdue case, the judge in that case (Chief Judge Jones) posed a series of written questions to the parties before accepting the plea. [read post]
22 May 2012, 9:24 am by Steve Hall
"2000 and Growing: Revealing Statistics in Exoneration Study," is Ashby Jones' WSJ Law Blog post. [read post]
21 May 2012, 5:55 pm
This rule was most recently applied in the matter of Osage Marine Services, Inc., Case No. 4:10-cv-1674, E.D. [read post]
21 May 2012, 12:42 pm by Joe Consumer
Believe me, you won’t ever find us lobbying to repeal overall caps no matter how “extreme” we say they are. [read post]
21 May 2012, 12:42 pm by Joe Consumer
Believe me, you won’t ever find us lobbying to repeal overall caps no matter how “extreme” we say they are. [read post]
20 May 2012, 9:01 pm by Dwight Sullivan
Jones, 7 M.J. 806, 808 (N.C.M.R. 1979). [read post]
20 May 2012, 6:09 am by Rosalind English
Recent cases concerning defence powers have been based, not on the ambit of the  ”forbidden area” ( Marchiori v Environment Agency [2002]), but on the notion that the government’s discretion in such matters is much wider (CND v Prime Minister [2002]; or that courts should be reticent (rather than constitutionally forbidden) to intervene (R v Jones [2006]). [read post]
20 May 2012, 2:00 am by Rachit Buch
For example, will the serious harm test be more onerous than the current need for a tort to be real and substantial, as set out in Jameel v Dow Jones [2005] EWCA Civ 75, or the “threshold of seriousness” considered in Cook v Telegraph [2011] EWHC 1519 (QB)? [read post]
18 May 2012, 8:23 am by McNabb Associates, P.C.
Egan-Jones Proxy Services, which advises institutional investors, recommended on Thursday that shareholders vote against re-electing Wal-Mart’s chief executive, Michael T. [read post]