Search for: "John Does 1, 2, 3"
Results 3581 - 3600
of 7,888
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
4 Jun 2015, 6:39 am
1. [read post]
3 Jun 2015, 4:00 am
But it has grown far less salient over the last few years, playing a much bigger role in the words of Al Qaeda and AQAP a few years ago than it does now—and playing a far lesser role in the propaganda of ISIS than it does in that of older terrorist groups. [read post]
2 Jun 2015, 9:24 am
The Board explained that determining whether a mark is generic involves a two-step inquiry: (1) what is the genus of goods or services at issue, and (2) does the relevant public understand the designation primarily to refer to that genus of goods and/or services. [read post]
1 Jun 2015, 4:05 pm
If he does have a dog, it isn't a labrador. 3) Biking is inherently dangerous. [read post]
Do We Finally Have a Canadian Re:Sound Copyright “Fitness Tariff” After 8 Years? “Are We There Yet”?
1 Jun 2015, 3:07 pm
(emphasis added)3. [read post]
1 Jun 2015, 2:24 pm
The Board explained that determining whether a mark is generic involves a two-step inquiry: (1) what is the genus of goods or services at issue, and (2) does the relevant public understand the designation primarily to refer to that genus of goods and/or services. [read post]
1 Jun 2015, 10:59 am
We still don’t know, following Elonis, whether the “true threats” exception to the First Amendment (1) covers only statements said with the purpose of putting someone in fear, (2) applies also to statements said knowing that the target will be put in fear, (3) applies also to statements said knowing that there’s a serious risk that the target will be put in fear, or (4) covers all statements that a reasonable person would view as aimed at putting… [read post]
1 Jun 2015, 8:40 am
So on the whole I think the Court was probably wise to stick to the narrow ground. 3) Obvious congrats to co-blogger John Elwood for the victory. [read post]
1 Jun 2015, 5:38 am
A, §§ 2-3; 16-5.2(a)(3), (a)(9).1 Such distinctions are facially content-based. [read post]
29 May 2015, 7:25 am
So how does this sting’s risk-benefit balance measure up in this regard? [read post]
28 May 2015, 1:38 pm
Using HD for two reasons: (1) they bought it and the idea that they can use one kind of disc and not another is not intuitive; (2) you’re asking them to use lower quality or spend more money for worse footage. [read post]
28 May 2015, 7:44 am
[John H. [read post]
27 May 2015, 3:41 pm
His own reasoning goes like this:1. [read post]
26 May 2015, 10:08 am
Have any suggestions for the 3 Count? [read post]
26 May 2015, 8:19 am
Does that restrict research? [read post]
25 May 2015, 1:53 pm
" Under Penal Law 260.10(1), "a person is guilty of endangering the welfare of a Page 3 child when he knowingly acts in a manner likely to be injurious to the physical, mental or moral welfare of a child less than seventeen years old or directs or authorizes such child to engage in an occupation involving a substantial risk of danger to his life or health. [read post]
25 May 2015, 1:53 pm
" Under Penal Law 260.10(1), "a person is guilty of endangering the welfare of a Page 3 child when he knowingly acts in a manner likely to be injurious to the physical, mental or moral welfare of a child less than seventeen years old or directs or authorizes such child to engage in an occupation involving a substantial risk of danger to his life or health. [read post]
24 May 2015, 12:56 pm
" 2) Hold on - we still need to talk about this. [read post]
24 May 2015, 12:56 pm
" 2) Hold on - we still need to talk about this. [read post]
23 May 2015, 9:00 pm
” 1 Page 586 [162 Misc.2d 24] A warrant was issued for respondent’s arrest. [read post]
