Search for: "Key v. State" Results 3581 - 3600 of 19,984
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
27 Jan 2011, 3:40 pm by stu@crimapp.com
The key holding is that the United States Supreme Court’s ruling in Padilla v Kentucky applies to sex offender registry consequences. [read post]
2 Sep 2022, 6:08 pm by Anthony Zaller
  This is also consistent with the California Supreme Court’s holding in Ross v. [read post]
24 Mar 2010, 10:21 am by Carl Folsom
On March 10, 2010, the KSC heard arguments in State of Kansas (Appellee) v. [read post]
27 Jan 2025, 9:01 pm by Vikram David Amar
Missouri has the power to withhold state assistance, “but the means it uses to achieve its ends must be [, as the Court observed in McCulloch v. [read post]
19 Sep 2013, 10:46 am by aallwash
While we haven’t learned much about the FISC’s legal interpretation of these two key provisions, here’s a brief guide to what we do know:  Section 702 Title VII, Section 702 of the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act (FISA), “Procedures for targeting certain persons outside the United States other than United States persons” (50 USC § 1881a) Allows for targeting of communications of foreign persons located abroad for… [read post]