Search for: "Long v State"
Results 3581 - 3600
of 45,258
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
4 Sep 2017, 3:47 am
McKinley v. [read post]
29 Jan 2020, 3:30 am
Comer (2017) and Zelman v. [read post]
10 Jul 2023, 7:38 am
Biden v. [read post]
23 Nov 2010, 6:46 am
After a week-long recess, the Justices are scheduled to meet today to consider pending petitions. [read post]
29 Dec 2016, 9:01 pm
Term Limits, Inc. v. [read post]
14 Aug 2023, 8:15 am
BONUS 3: Reeves v. [read post]
21 Oct 2010, 7:42 pm
See Revlon, Inc. v. [read post]
25 Feb 2009, 9:11 pm
Jeffrey Grob wrote in Batista v. [read post]
11 Sep 2017, 8:59 am
The post Wedding cakes v. religious beliefs? [read post]
31 Dec 2010, 9:01 pm
" He calls on the political branches to find "a long-term solution" to the vacancy problem.Within this discussion of judicial confirmations is a sentence that can plausibly be read as Chief Justice Roberts's response to President Obama's criticism, during his 2010 State of the Union speech, of the Court's decision in Citizens United v. [read post]
24 Oct 2013, 3:29 pm
Coakley) and the extent of state power to regulate abortion by uses of drugs rather than surgery (Cline v. [read post]
1 Dec 2021, 12:38 pm
State courts also had a long history of judicial review, including pathbreaking decisions striking down slavery as a violation of the Massachusetts Constitution. [read post]
5 Jan 2017, 11:37 am
In Girard v. [read post]
17 Jan 2025, 10:49 am
Nexus Pharmaceuticals, LLC v. [read post]
12 Jul 2018, 7:54 am
Recently, in Janus v. [read post]
In challenge to Indian Child Welfare Act, court will weigh the rights of states and the role of race
8 Nov 2022, 11:56 am
The dispute before the Supreme Court on Wednesday – Haaland v. [read post]
15 Feb 2013, 4:50 pm
In contrast to SMARA, the Ninth Circuit’s ruling in CBD v. [read post]
3 Dec 2015, 2:59 pm
That didn't take long! [read post]
24 Sep 2012, 11:00 am
[Rodriguez v. [read post]
17 May 2016, 6:28 am
But the long tradition of parallel state securities law enforcement made it difficult for the Justices to draw that conclusion. [read post]