Search for: "Matter of G. C. ,"
Results 3581 - 3600
of 4,013
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
5 Nov 2009, 4:45 pm
According to this approach disclaimers which exclude subject-matter disclosed as an embodiment of the invention are regarded as non-disclosed disclaimers and held unallowable unless they fall under one of the exceptions laid down in decisions G 1/03 and G 2/03. [42] In T 1050/99 considerable weight is placed on a passage in G 1/03 [2.5] concerning disclaimers which exclude non-working embodiments. [read post]
4 Nov 2009, 4:03 pm
This has the result that the invention of claims 1 and 25 as granted falls under the prohibition of A 53(a) EPC taken in combination with R 28(c) EPC (cf. also G 2/06 [29]). [4] In agreement with decision G 1/03 the amended claims 1 and 25, both containing a disclaimer not removing more than what is necessary to disclaim subject-matter falling under the prohibition of A 53(a) EPC in combination with R 28(c) EPC, meet the requirements of A 123(2) EPC.… [read post]
4 Nov 2009, 1:34 pm
The sale progressed, although in January 2007, the main mortgagee, G E Money, obtained a possession order for mortgage arrears and Waternill themselves obtained a £2,033 charge for money loaned to Miss Scrowther. [read post]
2 Nov 2009, 9:22 pm
Summary of Impacts G. [read post]
2 Nov 2009, 2:18 pm
So what's the explanation for S&C's missing the deadline for filing an appeal? [read post]
2 Nov 2009, 8:05 am
Although there is a broad spectrum on how derivatives may be used, the financial literature has identified two general categories: hedging and speculation. [12] Speculation can be defined as the practice of theorizing about matters over which there is no certain knowledge. [13] Speculators are traders who enter into a derivative agreement with the intention to seek profits by accepting high levels of risk; they rarely have an inherent interest in the market they participate.… [read post]
2 Nov 2009, 8:03 am
Speculation can be defined as the practice of theorizing about matters over which there is no certain knowledge[xiii]. [read post]
27 Oct 2009, 6:07 am
Accordingly, insurers usually have to base their underwriting decisions upon whatever information is available at the time of application, no matter how incomplete or unverified. [read post]
19 Oct 2009, 4:46 am
(IP Dragon) Denmark Denmark's new transfer pricing IP valuation guideline (IP finance) Europe ECJ: COLOR EDITION - the A-G delivers his opinion on the application by Lâncome: Lancôme v OHIM and CMS Hasche Sigle (Class 46) ECJ: Diesel ruling affirms that exhausting still trumps trademarks, but consent must be unequivocal: Makro Zelfbedieningsgroothandel CV, Metro Cash & Carry BV and Remo Zaandam BV v Diesel SpA (Class 46) (IPKat) CFI: KINDER vs TIMI KINDERJOGHURT: No res… [read post]
17 Oct 2009, 2:12 pm
A panel of experts advising the CDC is scheduled to debate the matter next week. [read post]
14 Oct 2009, 9:31 am
Law Lessons from LATASHA C. [read post]
11 Oct 2009, 3:47 pm
There is no single book that covers the subject matter in full detail. [read post]
7 Oct 2009, 4:44 pm
I don't begrudge them this money as a matter of principle. [read post]
7 Oct 2009, 4:30 am
C (full catalog of items)). [read post]
5 Oct 2009, 11:37 pm
Proof of service under (c), (d) and (e) below. [read post]
4 Oct 2009, 11:39 pm
As you'll see, I'm no equestrian (nor equine expert for that matter), but given the non-verbal logos shown above, are you able to tell what company operates a fleet of these semi tractor-trailers? [read post]
4 Oct 2009, 1:59 am
C. [read post]
2 Oct 2009, 11:08 am
SONIA VALVERDE; from Bexar County;4th district (04-08-00587-CV & 04-08-00857-CV, ___ SW3d ___, 06-10-09, pet denied Oct 2009) (designation of responsible third party, timelines, limitations, res judicata)09-0663 MICHAEL G. [read post]
2 Oct 2009, 7:05 am
Pure legal conclusions or matters not involving extrinsic evidence, are subject to de novo review under the abuse of discretion standard. [read post]
1 Oct 2009, 9:46 pm
Mr Bateman's letter of complaint to the Law Society of 15 December 2006 was in the following terms:Mr Rob ReisProfessional Standards DirectorThe Law Society of the Australian Capital TerritoryGPO Box 1562Canberra ACT 2601Dear Mr ReisI write to draw your attention (sic) a course of conduct by a legal practitioner in a recent matter, and to ask that you investigate whether that conduct breaches the professional standards expected of a legal practitioner in the Territory.Mr David… [read post]
