Search for: "Matter of Novel"
Results 3581 - 3600
of 7,154
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
24 Jan 2020, 11:02 am
To contact me about a potential legal matter see: contact For more regulatory law updates follow me on Twitter: @CanadaAttorney [read post]
28 Apr 2010, 7:13 am
Oh, and then there’s the little matter of his surf movies. [read post]
10 Nov 2009, 8:24 am
§101 to include business methods as patentable subject matter. [read post]
13 May 2022, 11:34 am
A patent application will succeed only if the invention falls within the scope of patentable subject matter and is novel, useful, and non-obvious. [read post]
12 Jul 2012, 4:44 am
Nothing matters more than adherence to principle, and if a few bodies had to be laid to waste in the process, that's just the price of intellectual integrity.Except it's not. [read post]
5 Dec 2011, 8:46 am
It doesn't matter.) [read post]
18 Sep 2017, 4:19 am
They get to speak too, no matter how much we hate them. [read post]
17 Jul 2022, 9:05 pm
Both illustrate the complexity of what the Court faces on health care matters. [read post]
11 Dec 2010, 11:01 am
” The Board found this claim to be novel and then examined its compliance with A 56. [read post]
22 Jan 2013, 12:58 pm
If the invention is novel and lots of people are willing to pay a premium over the manufacturing costs to get it, you probably need a patent. [read post]
13 Apr 2015, 12:55 pm
Mostyn J, always able to come up with a novel and striking descriptor considered the Husband to have a “modus operandi of complete turbidity” (I had to look it up too). [read post]
27 May 2015, 4:56 pm
They leave out important factors and, taken overall, lack objectivity in that they advance a ‘party line’…” The judge said that in effect the Department of Health had argued that, having regard to the novel subject matter of this FoIA request, the deference due to its two witnesses meant that what the FTT (and the Information Commissioner before it) should have done was “effectively accept the Department’s view, and thus the validity of the… [read post]
26 Mar 2008, 9:37 am
It is a novel concept, but one that seems to work at least fairly well. [read post]
4 Apr 2012, 2:31 pm
Heister, in which that court held that a UIM rejection form identical to the one at issue in this matter did specifically comply with § 1731(c). [read post]
22 Aug 2022, 6:44 pm
§ 103, which refuses protection to new developments where “the differences between the subject matter sought to be patented and the prior art are such that the subject matter as a whole would have been obvious at the time the invention was made to a person of ordinary skill in the art to which said subject matter pertains. [read post]
23 Nov 2008, 2:55 pm
Their reaction is justifiable in many ways, but it is also politically immature to some extent.It is hardly novel for presidents to turn to prior administrations to pick advisers. [read post]
1 Sep 2018, 4:26 am
If courts leapfrog the underlying constitutional merits in cases raising novel issues like digital privacy, then constitutional clarity—matter-of-fact guidance about what the Constitution requires—remains exasperatingly elusive. [read post]
21 May 2019, 1:04 pm
And that is the crux of the matter. [read post]
12 Apr 2015, 11:05 pm
The truth is, it doesn’t really matter whether the person you’re shooting is a friend, a stranger, or whatever… what matters are two things: First… Where and under what circumstances the photography is taking place, and Second… how you’re using the image or footage. [read post]
29 Jan 2024, 4:00 pm
” He outlined PERA as clarifying eligibility “in three ways”: by “abolish[ing] judicially created exceptions to patent eligibility,” by “clarify[ing] that eligibility determinations are to be made by considering every claim element of the patent as a whole and without regard to the novelty nonobvious and disclosure requirements,” and by setting forth “a specific but extensive list of excluded subject matter while maintaining the existing… [read post]
