Search for: "Peter v. Peter" Results 3581 - 3600 of 8,629
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
8 Mar 2017, 10:00 pm by Tommy Tobin
The three judge DeCoster appeals panel issued a three-opinion ruling, with the majority advancing a concept of responsible corporate officer liability arising from the FDCA and the Supreme Court’s ruling in United States v. [read post]
8 Mar 2017, 5:24 pm by Ilya Somin
Other right of center economists and health care experts have offered similarly damning assessments, including Megan McArdle, Peter Suderman, Scott Sumner, and Avik Roy. [read post]
7 Mar 2017, 3:16 am by Dennis Crouch
(Daily.2016.Professors) Tristan Gray–Le Coz and Charles Duan, Apply It to the USPTO: Review of the Implementation of Alice v. [read post]
3 Mar 2017, 9:30 pm by Dan Ernst
  The deadline for the Peter Gonville Stein Award is March 15, 2017. [read post]
1 Mar 2017, 9:30 am by Legal Beagle
The Crown Office said the report is still “under consideration” nearly four years on from when Police Scotland first referring the case to the Lord Advocate.JUDGE, SUSPENDED:Statement from the Judicial Office for Scotland on the suspension of part-time sheriff Peter WatsonSheriff Peter Watson was suspended from the office of part-time sheriff on 16 February 2015, in terms of section 34 of the Judiciary and Courts (Scotland) Act 2008. [read post]
25 Feb 2017, 7:00 am by Jordan Brunner
Robert Loeb and Emma Kohse examined the first invocation of the state secrets privilege by the DOJ in the Trump administration in Salim v. [read post]
23 Feb 2017, 4:31 pm by INFORRM
The decision in Dawson-Damer v Taylor Wessing LLP ([2017] EWCA Civ 74) reverses a decision by the High Court that the law firm Taylor Wessing had not breached the Data Protection Act 1998 (DPA) by refusing to carry out searches on grounds of proportionality, legal privilege and improper purpose. [read post]
21 Feb 2017, 4:00 am by Guest Blogger
“The reasonable person”, wrote Justices Claire L’Heureux-Dubé and Beverley McLachlin in R. v. [read post]
19 Feb 2017, 9:02 pm by Michael C. Dorf
Judge Brinkema rightly rejected this argument, citing the Supreme Court’s 2005 decision in McCreary County v. [read post]
18 Feb 2017, 4:37 am by Jordan Brunner
Josh Blackman studied the reasoning of the Ninth Circuit’s panel opinion in Washington v. [read post]
17 Feb 2017, 9:30 pm by Dan Ernst
  They include Annette Gordon-Reed and Peter S. [read post]
17 Feb 2017, 3:40 pm by Seyfarth Shaw LLP
Indeed, this amendment conforms to the California Supreme Court’s decision in Duran v. [read post]