Search for: "Quick v. State"
Results 3581 - 3600
of 4,768
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
25 Jun 2012, 8:55 am
Inc. v Titan Elec. [read post]
19 Nov 2016, 10:44 am
The case of State v. [read post]
14 Nov 2016, 11:02 am
In People v. [read post]
28 Nov 2018, 1:59 pm
In State v. [read post]
20 Mar 2011, 1:32 am
The court made quick work of the defense, stating that “agents employed…for their expertise…may not claim any greater duty on their clients’ part to anticipate and rectify their errors. [read post]
28 Jan 2019, 2:16 pm
Fogelson (2005) Making Civil Rights Law: Thurgood Marshall and the Supreme Court, 1936-1961 by Mark V. [read post]
4 Apr 2009, 5:18 am
Read on McDuff:In State v. [read post]
4 Feb 2011, 11:03 pm
State v. [read post]
13 Jun 2012, 6:00 am
David Lazarus’ article argues that Microsoft’s action, and the Supreme Court’s decision in AT&T v. [read post]
17 Jan 2007, 12:45 pm
First, for Steinberg to dismiss the eight to ten hours preceding Lisa's death as "at most eight hours of pain and suffering" or as he alternatively states, a "quick loss of consciousness" demonstrates that he is as devoid of any empathy or human emotion now as he was almost 20 years ago when he stood trial for Lisa's homicide. [read post]
31 Aug 2022, 4:29 am
John Morgan was not the first advertising attorney following the 1977 Supreme Court case of Bates v. [read post]
13 Jul 2016, 8:21 am
The seminal food safety case of United States v. [read post]
10 Jul 2018, 5:30 am
(Thousand Island Park Corp. v. [read post]
29 Nov 2009, 9:28 am
It's been 33 years since Andreson v. [read post]
13 May 2011, 2:11 pm
Joseph Rakofsky has filed a lawsuit, in the courts of the State of New York, seeking damages and injunctive relief based upon defamation and invasion of his civil rights. [read post]
7 Jul 2024, 5:13 am
The High Court agreed in R (Harrison) v Secretary of State for Justice [2020] EWHC 2096 (Admin) that the current lack of provision for legal humanist weddings in England and Wales was in breach of Article 9 ECHR. [read post]
18 Nov 2010, 5:34 am
Instead, the court in the next sentence provided what sounds like a prior art argument, stating, "public television channels have used the same basic idea for years. [read post]
20 Jan 2007, 9:21 am
" The leading case is Université du Québec à Trois-Rivières v. [read post]
16 Dec 2011, 10:31 am
" Judge Rakoff consolidated the case with a related matter, SEC v. [read post]
23 Jan 2023, 4:55 pm
Next, Justin gives us a quick primer on the national security reasons for regulation of submarine cables. [read post]
