Search for: "Roll v. Roll"
Results 3581 - 3600
of 6,810
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
3 Sep 2014, 12:11 am
The purpose of the new Act, according to the Master of the Rolls, Lord Dyson, seems to be a mixture of saving money and speeding up cases – which itself saves money. [read post]
2 Sep 2014, 6:45 am
“We have confirmed V&A Waterfront in Cape Town for our first store in South Africa during 2015,” H&M press officer Håcan Andersson told Moneyweb.This has also been confirmed by the largest JSE-listed property company Growthpoint, which co-owns the V&A Waterfront with the Public Investment Corporation.At the company’s full year results in August, Growthpoint CEO Norbert Sasse said H&M would take up two floors totalling 4 700 square metres at… [read post]
1 Sep 2014, 12:49 am
See paragraph 13(a) of my decision in RJ v Secretary of State for Work and Pensions [2012] AACR 28. [read post]
29 Aug 2014, 8:04 am
The case of Conrad v. [read post]
29 Aug 2014, 6:29 am
State v. [read post]
28 Aug 2014, 7:11 pm
The petition of the day is: Bonner v. [read post]
28 Aug 2014, 3:37 pm
Co. v. [read post]
28 Aug 2014, 5:10 am
And indeed, the New York Court of Appeals has approved their use, per People v. [read post]
27 Aug 2014, 4:30 am
The case of Freeman v. [read post]
26 Aug 2014, 12:56 pm
In a seminal case in North Carolina, Hinkamp v. [read post]
26 Aug 2014, 4:34 am
First Baptist Church of Roswell v. [read post]
23 Aug 2014, 12:11 pm
Unfortunately, New Jersey courts have since rolled back those protections, starting with a 2011 ruling in State v. [read post]
20 Aug 2014, 4:30 am
Thomas v. [read post]
19 Aug 2014, 7:56 am
See, Sytsema by Sytsema v. [read post]
18 Aug 2014, 8:06 am
” We trimmed the chapter down substantially, including major surgery on the way-too-long Nike v. [read post]
18 Aug 2014, 6:00 am
Sabo v. [read post]
17 Aug 2014, 11:31 am
Carlos Martinez v. [read post]
16 Aug 2014, 12:15 pm
Sebelius and King v. [read post]
15 Aug 2014, 2:34 pm
I need to give you a post on GRK Canada v. [read post]
15 Aug 2014, 1:30 pm
O’Rourke v. [read post]