Search for: "SESSIONS v. STATE" Results 3581 - 3600 of 6,598
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
23 Jul 2015, 9:11 am by Rebecca Tushnet
Session 2 | Dina Leytes (Griesing Law, LLC), Moderator Lord Eldon, Lord Byron, and the Public DomainGary Dyer (Cleveland State University)Commentator | Simon Stern (University of Toronto) Byron’s strategies to deal with Eldon’s doctrine that created a no man’s land b/t criminality and property if works were potentially seditiously libellous or obscene; purported to find in an earlier decision a doctrine that an author could have no remedy if the policy… [read post]
22 Jul 2015, 2:18 pm by Rebecca Tushnet
Session 1 | Ellen Goodman (Rutgers), Moderator  Access and Development: The History of ‘Development’ and WIPOSara Bannerman (McMaster University)Commentator | Christopher S. [read post]
22 Jul 2015, 6:47 am by Wells Bennett
A programming note from Lawfare HQ: for the rest of this week, Lawfare unfortunately won't be almost-live-blogging pre-trial motions litigation in the military commissions case of United States v. [read post]
20 Jul 2015, 9:00 am by Wells Bennett
A whopping two weeks of court time earlier had been reserved for pre-trial motions in United States v. [read post]
13 Jul 2015, 11:45 am by Quinta Jurecic , Staley Smith
Rezaian’s hastily called court session on Monday had any link to the [nuclear] talks. [read post]
12 Jul 2015, 5:05 pm by Joy Waltemath
As a result of issues relating to her tardiness and absences, she received a “final coaching” session (the first step under the progressive discipline policy) on May 22, 2012. [read post]
12 Jul 2015, 4:47 am by Marie-Andree Weiss
A New York Senate bill, S560-2015, introduced in May by State Senator John A. [read post]
10 Jul 2015, 5:00 am by Daniel E. Cummins
In his recent post-Koken decision addressing numerous Motions In Limine filed by both parties in a UIM/Bad Faith case in the matter of Clemens v. [read post]
9 Jul 2015, 10:09 pm by Bill Marler
It was so bad, he stated he did not want any more chemo if this was what he had to look forward to every time. [read post]
9 Jul 2015, 6:00 am by Administrator
In R v Marcott, Justices Arbour and Osler concurred that an element of the offense was “that deception is practiced…and that the person undertaking to tell fortunes represents that he has the power to do so with the intention that such representation should be believed”, and “[where an] assertion, or undertaking [to predict the future] is made for reward…with intent to deceive, the offense is complete. [read post]
1 Jul 2015, 3:06 am by Matrix Legal Information Team
The relevant question under both provisions is whether the UK tax is “computed by reference to the same profits or income by reference to which the United States tax is computed. [read post]
29 Jun 2015, 12:44 pm by Mark Walsh
Justice Ginsburg is up next with Arizona State Legislature v. [read post]