Search for: "SUMMERS v. STATE" Results 3581 - 3600 of 5,455
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
18 Aug 2014, 7:04 am
Among them, what would be the one to look forward to the most after the summer break? [read post]
21 Jun 2016, 2:56 am
 | Justice Slade delivers judgement in Arthur J Gallagher Services v Skriptchenko Never too late 99 [week ending on Sunday 5 June] German Constitutional Court sends sampling saga into another loop | Who should pay for the independence of the Boards of Appeal? [read post]
5 Sep 2024, 5:00 am
”In so ruling the court in Wingate relied upon the Pennsylvania Superior Court decision in the case of Blumer v. [read post]
31 Jan 2011, 6:25 am by Susan Brenner
This is how the case arose: During the summer of 2007, State Trooper Peter Cooke began an undercover operation pretending to be a fifteen year old prostitute on Craigslist. . . . [read post]
13 Nov 2019, 10:35 am by Nora Freeman Engstrom, Robert L. Rabin
Indeed, the list of California tort law “firsts” is long and varied, including such heavyweights as Summers v. [read post]
27 Apr 2021, 10:37 am by Amy Howe
ShareIn 1969, the Supreme Court ruled in Tinker v. [read post]
18 Apr 2019, 3:53 pm by Jennifer Lynch
Second, as the Supreme Court recognized in Carpenter v United States last summer, detailed travel data like this can provide “an intimate window into a person's life, revealing not only his particular movements, but through them his ‘familial, political, professional, religious, and sexual associations. [read post]
17 Aug 2018, 4:11 am by Edith Roberts
” At The Federalist Society Review, Richard Raile argues that last term’s decision in partisan-gerrymandering case Gill v. [read post]
25 May 2008, 3:02 am
Rev. 521 (Summer 2007)In this article, the authors analyze the differences in the various definitions of the "shoreline" under Hawaii law, and the Hawaii Supreme Court decision in Diamond v. [read post]
29 Jun 2009, 10:51 am
  The state court ruling can be found here. [read post]
20 Jan 2022, 2:01 pm by John Elwood
Some have suggested the court is more likely to grant blockbusters when they won’t be heard until next term, because they won’t have to rush the decision in the few months remaining before the court’s summer recess (or, perhaps more cynically, because they’ll have longer before having to confront high-profile, politically freighted decisions). [read post]