Search for: "Sales v. State"
Results 3581 - 3600
of 21,151
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
15 Jun 2020, 1:29 pm
The justices asked the U.S. solicitor general to file a brief expressing the views of the United States in Texas v. [read post]
15 Jun 2020, 9:26 am
NuVasive, Inc. v. [read post]
15 Jun 2020, 7:00 am
Several trade associations gave feedback, and raised five major concerns: The broad scope of the rule; The inability of many contractors to meet the August 2020 compliance deadline; (3) Whether the rule will apply outside the United States; Whether the term “use” would include a reseller’s commercial sales of prohibited products, thus preclu [read post]
15 Jun 2020, 4:29 am
The suit was filed in New York state court asserting claims under New York law based on New York forum selection and choice-of-law provisions in an “Investors Agreement” between BML and CCA. [read post]
15 Jun 2020, 1:00 am
A type of ‘top-down’ approach was relied on in the 2013 US case In re Innovatio IP Ventures, LLC and the 2014 Japanese case Samsung v Apple Japan (Apple Japan Godo Kaisha v Samsung Electronics Co). [read post]
12 Jun 2020, 1:10 pm
Additional Resources: County of Santa Cruz et al v. [read post]
12 Jun 2020, 7:44 am
Digital wallets also now surpass cash at the point-of-sale, accounting for 36 percent of in-store sales in 2019. [read post]
12 Jun 2020, 5:58 am
In 2009, Mr Dill removed and arranged for the sale of the urns at auction, which sold for £55,000. [read post]
12 Jun 2020, 1:53 am
In a communication accompanying the summons to oral proceedings, the Board set out its preliminary opinion that the invention did not involve an inventive step (Article 56 EPC).V. [read post]
11 Jun 2020, 9:17 am
Raich, 545 U.S. 1, 27, 29 (2005) and United States v. [read post]
11 Jun 2020, 2:47 am
Retrobrands USA LLC v. [read post]
10 Jun 2020, 8:38 am
Archer and White Sales, Inc., 19-963, and Archer and White Sales, Inc. v. [read post]
10 Jun 2020, 8:10 am
If the latter, then this may be contrasted with the approach taken by Pumfrey J in Abbott v Ranbaxy [2004] where he stated that had he not granted summary judgment on validity grounds, he would have granted a preliminary injunction. [read post]
8 Jun 2020, 1:20 pm
In United States v. [read post]
8 Jun 2020, 12:36 pm
Scherer v. [read post]
8 Jun 2020, 9:57 am
V. [read post]
8 Jun 2020, 9:57 am
V. [read post]
8 Jun 2020, 2:02 am
R (on the application of Pathan) v Secretary of State for the Home Department, heard 12 December 2019. [read post]
6 Jun 2020, 9:26 pm
But with little niceties in the Constitution about rights to a speedy trial and all those discovery deadlines, it is going to be interesting to see just how the United States v. [read post]
6 Jun 2020, 4:59 pm
Last month, the attorneys general for eleven different states petitioned the U.S. [read post]
