Search for: "Sharp v. Sharp"
Results 3581 - 3600
of 4,127
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
5 Nov 2009, 7:40 pm
Gartenberg v. [read post]
2 Nov 2009, 6:00 am
The response in CA v. [read post]
2 Nov 2009, 5:49 am
Nichols v. [read post]
30 Oct 2009, 7:26 pm
Customers arrived at the newly designed vBulletin web site, sporting a confident Superman-like mascot tearing open his buttoned-down shirt to reveal a “V” on his tee and a nifty new powerful URL – best-forum-software.com. [read post]
30 Oct 2009, 6:50 am
French ‘3 strikes’ law now legal (Ars Technica) (IP Watch) Chinese authors condemn Google book deal (Managing Intellectual Property) (China Blawg) (China Hearsay) Global Global - General Happy 40th birthday internet (Securing Innovation) Global - Copyright Anti-piracy laws and lawsuits fail to change social norms (TorrentFreak) Discussion of Alan Kaufman’s ‘The Electronic Book Burning’ (1709 Copyright Blog) Paranoid… [read post]
30 Oct 2009, 5:50 am
French '3 strikes' law now legal (Ars Technica) (IP Watch) Chinese authors condemn Google book deal (Managing Intellectual Property) (China Blawg) (China Hearsay) Global Global - General Happy 40th birthday internet (Securing Innovation) Global - Copyright Anti-piracy laws and lawsuits fail to change social norms (TorrentFreak) Discussion of Alan Kaufman's 'The Electronic Book Burning' (1709 Copyright Blog) Paranoid Android- sharp divide between the approach of old… [read post]
30 Oct 2009, 5:50 am
French '3 strikes' law now legal (Ars Technica) (IP Watch) Chinese authors condemn Google book deal (Managing Intellectual Property) (China Blawg) (China Hearsay) Global Global - General Happy 40th birthday internet (Securing Innovation) Global - Copyright Anti-piracy laws and lawsuits fail to change social norms (TorrentFreak) Discussion of Alan Kaufman's 'The Electronic Book Burning' (1709 Copyright Blog) Paranoid Android- sharp divide between the approach of old… [read post]
28 Oct 2009, 4:35 am
Sharpe an impermissible form of substantive due process, as impermissible as, say, Roe v. [read post]
27 Oct 2009, 3:35 am
Sharpe-- holding that race discrimination violates the Due Process Clause of the Fifth Amendment (an amendment ratified in 1791, when slavery was prevalent). [read post]
26 Oct 2009, 6:25 am
(IP Dragon) Colombia Legal victory for Coca Cola over trade mark (IP tango) Denmark Danish Supreme Court affirms decision forcing food stall operator using ORIENTEXPRESSEN to change her trade mark (Class 46) Europe Questions on acquiescence for ECJ in Budejovicky Budvar Narodni Podnik v Anheuser-Busch Inc (Class 46) (IPKat) EWHC questions referred to ECJ in L'Oréal SA v eBay now available on Curia (Class 46) Disruptive innovations:… [read post]
26 Oct 2009, 5:25 am
Or on life support, at least - MEI v JCM American Corp stayed pending outcome of Mars v Coin Acceptors (Property, intangible) O2 Micro - ITC judge grants in part O2's motion for summary determination of importa [read post]
26 Oct 2009, 5:25 am
Or on life support, at least - MEI v JCM American Corp stayed pending outcome of Mars v Coin Acceptors (Property, intangible) O2 Micro - ITC judge grants in part O2's motion for summary determination of importa [read post]
25 Oct 2009, 5:35 pm
The motion to enter a consent decree in Northwest Austin Municipal Utility District No. 1 v. [read post]
21 Oct 2009, 11:16 pm
The case is Bird-B-Gone, Inc. v. [read post]
21 Oct 2009, 12:54 pm
In fact, the MOU places a sharp emphasis on solar energy, making it a “high priority” to process applications for solar development in “any areas deemed most appropriate,” areas identified as solar energy zones in the BLM Solar PEIS, REZs identified in the DRECP, and areas identified by the Renewable Energy Transmission Initiative. [read post]
20 Oct 2009, 11:51 am
The issue in the case, Virginia v. [read post]
20 Oct 2009, 9:24 am
., v. [read post]
19 Oct 2009, 9:51 am
After 2005’s Cleveland Bar Association v. [read post]
19 Oct 2009, 8:48 am
The steep inclines, sharp curves, and great speed necessarily are sources of peril. [read post]
7 Oct 2009, 8:00 pm
Supreme Court oral argument in Salazar v. [read post]
