Search for: "Stanford Law Review"
Results 3581 - 3600
of 3,687
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
6 Aug 2007, 2:30 pm
Did you enjoy working on law review? [read post]
15 Apr 2015, 6:30 am
Light duty is generally not required by workers’ compensation law.] [read post]
3 May 2020, 6:30 am
” (84) They refused to accept that the Constitution was an anti-democratic, legal instrument that smuggled in judge-made common law and elevated the judiciary above the will of the sovereign people—who they believed alone enjoyed final interpretive authority over the nation’s fundamental law. [read post]
17 Apr 2022, 6:49 am
In a 2018 Harvard Business Review article, researchers from the consulting firm BetterUp shared the results of their survey of over 1,600 workers. [read post]
22 Nov 2024, 10:31 am
Evidently, the pair did not even review the "sources" that Grammarly provided before lifting them. [read post]
1 Apr 2025, 9:36 am
Consider, for example, the structural workflow of a traditional law firm. [read post]
15 Apr 2022, 4:30 am
As Erik Brynjolfsson of the Massachusetts Institute of Technology and his student Avinash Collis explained in a December 2019 article in the Harvard Business Review, such benefits far exceed those measured by conventional GDP. [read post]
16 Sep 2024, 9:05 pm
Instead, regulators could take harder looks at the ownership of media firms, particularly when reviewing M&A activity. [read post]
19 Apr 2020, 9:05 pm
” In a forthcoming article in the Stanford Law Review, we explain how unrules are the opposite of rules. [read post]
2 Jul 2007, 9:46 am
Adrian Vermeule, otro de los escritores superprolÃÂficos del aparato académico estadounidense, se pregunta en este paper del Stanford Law Review sobre eventuales ventajas de integrar "legos" a la Corte Suprema. [read post]
14 Feb 2018, 9:58 am
Skepticism and assumptions about impactSkepticism about surveillance impacts like chilling effects is, as noted, is persistent with commentators like Stanford Law’s Michael Sklansky insisting there “little empirical support” for chilling effects associated with surveillance or Leslie Kendrick, of UVA Law, labeling the evidence supporting such claims “flimsy” and calling for more systematic research on point. [read post]
7 Dec 2009, 11:31 pm
You can find cites for this and most other legal assertions I make here in my Stanford Law Review article on this subject.) [read post]
15 Jul 2024, 4:44 pm
Olson, which upheld a now-expired Watergate-era anti-corruption law called the Independent Counsel Act. [read post]
3 Apr 2025, 6:05 am
As I detailed back in 2020 in an article in the Stanford Law Review, on the whole, the focus of these statutes was on empowering the president to negotiate trade agreements that would lower tariffs in reciprocal fashion with trading partners. [read post]
12 Jun 2017, 9:01 am
So it was a fortuitous event that I came across Jeanne Fromer's article The Unregulated Certification Mark(et), published in January in the Stanford Law Review. [read post]
29 Oct 2008, 7:21 pm
"I'm hoping that the average person reviews their votes closely," she said. [read post]
13 Jan 2025, 3:40 am
Patrick, really happy to have you here on the Geek in Review. [read post]
29 Oct 2022, 3:44 pm
We reviewed them all and summarized many of the noteworthy arguments. [read post]
12 May 2025, 1:36 pm
” Many others have spent more time exploring the common law and Sherman Act drafting history than have I; however, my understanding from reviewing works by Werden and Hawk is that the meaning of “monopolize” — and even “monopoly” beyond one established by the government — is unclear or complicated. [read post]
1 Oct 2019, 2:30 pm
If your law degree is shinier or you practice in an area where the U.S. [read post]
