Search for: "State v. Doctor"
Results 3581 - 3600
of 9,595
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
4 Feb 2015, 4:25 am
I frankly am surprised this issue hasn't been decided yet: Whether a foreign truck driver working for a foreign trucking firm who gets injured while driving a foreign truck on United States territory can be the subject of a state workers' compensation scheme if the driver had already availed himself of the foreign system.But, apparently that issue has never been addressed - at least not by the United States Supreme Court.SCOTUS docketed for review the case… [read post]
27 May 2016, 6:10 am
He admitted to submitting the claim on behalf of his long-deceased aunt and explained how he created the doctor's letter using forms obtained from the Internet. [read post]
23 Jan 2008, 12:43 pm
Alexander v. [read post]
24 May 2010, 5:34 am
Such was the case in McLean v. [read post]
8 Dec 2017, 7:05 am
She relied upon the Third Circuit’s decision in Borse v. [read post]
17 Oct 2014, 6:00 am
Luzerne County Court of Common Pleas Judge Lesa Gelb spoke of the issue in the case of Mangan v. [read post]
27 Aug 2024, 9:01 pm
As the Supreme Court recognized in United States v. [read post]
26 Apr 2022, 5:40 am
People v. [read post]
16 Sep 2024, 10:49 pm
"] Last week I wrote about the Fifth Circuit's decision in United States v. [read post]
9 Apr 2008, 5:01 am
North American Medical Corp. v. [read post]
30 Oct 2015, 1:12 pm
Wang: Art v. [read post]
11 Sep 2008, 8:12 pm
See Gourdine v. [read post]
3 Jul 2011, 7:50 pm
Co. v. [read post]
7 Nov 2016, 6:47 am
In April 2011, the employee notified Vascular that his doctor still had not cleared him to return to work. [read post]
4 Jan 2016, 6:21 am
” The employee, however, stated that she “hope[d]” to return by September 2007. [read post]
23 Sep 2014, 12:01 pm
In Plascencia v. [read post]
26 May 2011, 3:20 am
” State v. [read post]
10 Aug 2011, 3:13 pm
Justice Dennis Thomas stated: When faced with a “very ill man” Dr. [read post]
4 Aug 2008, 8:45 am
Sweeney, who presided over the month-long trial that ended on July 17.The Court of Appeal's 2005 decision in State Farm v. [read post]
18 Apr 2007, 7:20 am
(Personal plug: Kennedy's opinion accepts the argument on this point of an amicus brief by a few law profs, including yours truly.)3) The distinction on which Kennedy principally relies -- the greater specificity of the federal statute -- works for overbreadth and vagueness, but it's not clear that it should make a difference on the core issue: whether a government (state or federal) can ban what many doctors think is the safest way to perform a medical procedure. [read post]
