Search for: "State v. Gross" Results 3581 - 3600 of 4,132
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
5 Nov 2020, 7:35 am by Kristian Soltes
’s V 2.65% $5.3 billion deal to acquire Plaid Inc., a key player in the financial-technology space. [read post]
9 Jul 2014, 1:15 pm by Charles (Chuck) Rubin
  However, since the New Streamlined Procedures are now available to U.S. taxpayers residing in the United States, the 2014 OVDP is intended to be used by taxpayers who have serious concerns with criminal violations. [read post]
12 Aug 2024, 4:22 am by Peter A. Mahler
The case of Mestousis v Titan Concrete, Inc. is a powerful be-careful-what-you-ask-for reminder to any petitioner who seeks to have the potential fair value award bonded. [read post]
14 Apr 2016, 6:00 am by Administrator
The legislation states that every person who contravenes the Safe Streets Act is liable for a fine up to $500 for a first offence. [read post]
16 May 2009, 7:33 am by Michael Payne
 Whistleblower Protections  Additional protections for state, local, and government contractor whistleblowers are also provided for in a new clause of the interim rules. [read post]
8 Mar 2012, 10:20 am by James Hamilton
The measure amends the Securities Act and the Securities Exchange Act to establish a new category of issuers known as emerging growth companies which are issuers that have total annual gross revenues of less than $1 billion. [read post]
24 Feb 2007, 6:32 am
Not all state court rules on military pension division are the same. [read post]
5 Jan 2009, 3:15 am
Hulteen, No. 07-543Title VII/Denial of pre-'79 pregnancy leave service credits in computing pension December 10, 2008 Argument Transcript hereSCOTUS docket hereSCOTUSWIKI here Noted here: SCOTUSblog (argument recap)Gross v. [read post]
6 Sep 2022, 3:34 am by Peter Mahler
Applying those factors to the facts at hand, the court found a mixed bag: And here, CEM [the law firm] duly registered as a limited liability partnership with the Secretary of State. [read post]
2 Apr 2012, 5:09 pm by INFORRM
  A snapshot of recent cases, for example, shows that £10,000 can easily be incurred by one party just to get to strike out or summary judgement (see reports on Lait v Evening Standard, Kordowski v Hudson, Robins v Kordowski) – and for some cases this incredibly conservative (Apsion v Butler). [read post]