Search for: "State v. House" Results 3581 - 3600 of 28,802
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
10 Feb 2013, 2:58 pm by NL
In many areas, particularly in the north, social housing providers state that they have very few one bed properties, so those looking to downsize will either be frustrated, or forced into the private sector, ironically increasing the housing benefit bill. [read post]
14 Nov 2015, 10:23 am by Jack Goldsmith
The White House has never really made a strong push for an Islamic State AUMF (even though it did finally send up a draft this year). [read post]
7 Dec 2022, 2:26 pm by NARF
(Navajo and Hopi Indian Land Settlement Act of 1974)United States v. [read post]
16 May 2018, 10:37 pm by Anthony Gaughan
He famously broke with the conservatives in the NFIB v. [read post]
1 Jul 2020, 2:24 pm by Unknown
Bureau of Indian Affairs (Freedom of Information Act)State Courts Bulletinhttps://www.narf.org/nill/bulletins/state/2020.htmlLavallie v. [read post]
6 Jun 2020, 2:15 pm by Giles Peaker
SSWP V WT and Redcar and Cleveland BC (HB) (2019) UKUT 372 (AAC) Very late to this one (I missed it) but a brief note on a doomed attempt in the Upper Tribunal to challenge The Secretary of State for Work and Pensions v Hockley & Anor (2019) EWCA Civ 1080 on how to assess bedrooms for the bedroom tax. [read post]
29 Jul 2010, 1:48 pm by WIMS
The EAB interpreted this provision to require the lessor to make "one of two affirmative statements" -- to either disclose what the lessor knows about lead-based paint in the housing or to affirmatively state that the lessor has no knowledge of the presence of lead-based paint and/or hazards in the housing. [read post]
8 Feb 2023, 4:10 am by jonathanturley
The Speaker represents the entire body of the House of Representatives — Democratic and Republican — in the State of the Union. [read post]
28 Dec 2018, 7:24 am
”  The purpose of this provision is to avoid pleading in the alternative if a Court decides during the trial that the information is not a trade secret.This provision, adopted by other states from the Uniform Trade Secrets Act (USTA), has divided courts across the United States into three camps, although Maryland has not examined it in detail. [read post]
27 Mar 2013, 1:42 pm by WIMS
The Appeals Court says, "The district court dismissed the complaint for failure to state a claim, predicting that, under the circumstances presented, the Arkansas Supreme Court would not recognize a cause of action against a third party for attorney's fees incurred in separate litigation. [read post]