Search for: "State v. Husband" Results 3581 - 3600 of 7,275
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
8 Jul 2014, 11:51 am by Cynthia Marcotte Stamer
Department of Labor’s Wage and Hour Division (DOL) June 27, 2014 Notice of Proposed Rulemaking (NPRM), which would amend the definition of spouse under the current Family and Medical Leave Act of 1993 (FMLA) regulations in light of the United States Supreme Court’s decision in United States v. [read post]
7 Jul 2014, 5:09 pm by Georgialee Lang
As many of you know, I was counsel for the Evangelical Fellowship of Canada in Attorney General v. [read post]
7 Jul 2014, 10:25 am
A car accident victim will receive a new trial after a state supreme court ruled highly-prejudicial statements regarding the occupation and salary of the plaintiff's husband were allowed before the jury prior to its verdict. [read post]
1 Jul 2014, 7:30 am
The applicant emphasised that neither her husband nor any other member of her family put pressure on her to dress in this manner.12. [read post]
30 Jun 2014, 5:43 pm by Law Lady
HUSSEY, husband and wife; WINCHESTER LAKES CORPORATION; THE HONORABLE RICK SCOTT, Governor of the State of Florida; and FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF ECONOMIC OPPORTUNITY; FLORIDA WILDLIFE FEDERATION; and COLLIER COUNTY AUDUBON SOCIETY, INC., Appellees. 2nd District.The Law Lady. [read post]
30 Jun 2014, 2:08 pm by Mark Walsh
 June 30 is the latest the Court has sat since 1996, when the Justices took the bench on July 1 to issue just a single opinion, United States v. [read post]
29 Jun 2014, 8:00 pm by Stephanie Gutierrez
Background and decision On May 2, 2014, the Federal Court of Appeal released Canada (Attorney General) v. [read post]
27 Jun 2014, 5:07 am by Robin Shea
The proposed changes are intended to reflect (and expand upon) last year’s Supreme Court decision in United States v. [read post]
24 Jun 2014, 6:21 am by Joy Waltemath
Specifically, the rule would revise the definition of spouse under the FMLA in light of the Supreme Court’s decision in United States v. [read post]