Search for: "State v. State"
Results 3581 - 3600
of 258,437
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
1 Aug 2022, 4:30 am
Here is the complaint in Pueblo of Jemez v. [read post]
12 Apr 2007, 10:36 am
Moreover, even in those cases where it has been recognized in other states, the claims were all brought under federal law, and not the Declaration of Rights of the Maryland Constitution or other state constitutions. [read post]
1 May 2008, 9:29 pm
Coalition to Defend Affirmative Action v. [read post]
4 Jan 2018, 3:25 pm
The Nissan v. [read post]
24 Aug 2010, 7:09 am
Daprizio v. [read post]
9 Jan 2014, 4:00 pm
Additional Resources: State v. [read post]
19 Jul 2022, 3:30 am
Second, it tells the story of the Supreme Court’s 1984 opinion in Chevron v. [read post]
11 Feb 2013, 6:26 am
Here: State of Michigan Amicus Brief The other opening briefs are here. [read post]
14 Jun 2011, 11:02 am
In Sander v. [read post]
30 Mar 2012, 8:36 am
” Brown v. [read post]
27 Jan 2012, 9:12 am
As we mentioned previously, that issue is currently pending in the Alabama Supreme Court in Wyeth v. [read post]
20 Apr 2017, 11:05 am
State v. [read post]
29 May 2014, 1:10 pm
On May 27, 2014, the Supreme Court of Ohio heard oral argument in State of Ohio v. [read post]
24 Jan 2012, 7:44 am
S. 276, 281 (1983), and United States v. [read post]
11 Jul 2017, 1:27 pm
On July 5, 2016, the Supreme Court of Ohio handed down a merit decision in State v. [read post]
16 Mar 2010, 11:19 pm
For example, in Freda v Board of Educ. of City of New York, 224 A.D.2d 360, the court ruled that the NYC Police Retirement System could “recoup” over $100,000 of the retirement allowance that had be paid to Freda because the required §211 approval had not been obtained prior to his being reemployed by the New York City Board of Education following his retirement from the New York City Police Department.Such wavers are not required with respect to such reemployments by an… [read post]
16 Jun 2009, 4:00 am
For example, in Freda v Board of Educ. of City of New York, 224 A.D.2d 360, the court ruled that the NYC Police Retirement System could "recoup" over $100,000 of the retirement allowance that had be paid to Freda because the required §211 approval had not been obtained prior to his being reemployed by the New York City Board of Education following his retirement from the New York City Police Department.Such wavers are not required with respect to such reemployments by… [read post]
8 Jan 2013, 7:30 pm
v What’s law got to do with it? [read post]
5 Aug 2015, 11:39 am
On August 3, 2015, the California Supreme Court filed its decision in City of San Diego v. [read post]
7 Jan 2016, 12:00 am
Ass'n v. [read post]
