Search for: "Stephens v. United States"
Results 3581 - 3600
of 3,645
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
4 Jun 2007, 3:48 pm
This is like the Times's reporting on Cohen v. [read post]
31 May 2007, 3:47 pm
CAAF's new opinion in United States v. [read post]
27 May 2007, 10:11 pm
Seth at Quizlaw tells us that; Section 6103 of Title V of the United States Code reads, in relevant part: (a) The following are legal public holidays: … Memorial Day, the las [read post]
24 May 2007, 9:43 am
Legal ethics speclialists may recall Standing Committee on Discipline in the United States District Court for the Central District of California v. [read post]
22 May 2007, 2:29 pm
Rasmussen, "The Story of Case v. [read post]
21 May 2007, 8:03 am
Board of Trade, 06-1265), on the power of states to tax the interest on other states' municipal bonds (Kentucky Department of Revenue v. [read post]
21 May 2007, 12:53 am
But while European companies can breathe a little easier in the United States, there's increasing unease at home about the emergence of European equivalents to the U.S. [read post]
19 May 2007, 10:12 am
Rather, he invites the State to violate two of the most basic norms of a civilized society - that the State's penal authority be invoked only where necessary to serve the ends of justice, not the ends of a particular individual, and that punishment be imposed only where the State has adequate assurance that the punishment is justified.United States Supreme Court Justice, 1990(1)Robert Comer, Christopher Newton and Elijah Page have something in common, aside… [read post]
13 May 2007, 12:31 pm
See United States v. [read post]
11 May 2007, 12:52 am
Splenda case, or, as it's officially known, Merisant Co. v. [read post]
7 May 2007, 3:51 pm
Following graduation, Sprigman clerked for the Honorable Stephen Reinhardt of the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit, and for Justice Lourens H. [read post]
1 May 2007, 12:25 pm
Stephen Karas, the former chief engineer of the M/V Tanabata (renamed the M/V Resolve) pleaded guilty to conspiracy and making false statements on March 29, 2007. [read post]
30 Apr 2007, 5:57 pm
Although the Supreme Court did not accept KSR's submissions in full, it unanimously agreed that they were correct on the facts of tbe dispute before it.On the background to this ruling and the TSM test, see Patently-O hereOn yesterday's ruling see Patently-O, Patent Baristas and and Duncan BucknellMicrosoft Corp v AT & T was a 7-1 ruling (Justice John Paul Stephens dissenting) that allowed Microsoft's appeal and agreed that the company should not be held… [read post]
18 Apr 2007, 10:30 pm
In the post 9/11 world the men and women in the United States Navy and United States Coast Guard are on call twenty-four hours a day monitoring commercial and private vessels on the high seas. [read post]
13 Apr 2007, 3:14 pm
If they did, the Chevron framework in administrative law would be hard to justify-at least if Chevron is to be justified, as it is in United States v. [read post]
12 Apr 2007, 10:33 am
Do we classify them as Chief Justice Taney did Dred Scott and African Americans generally, as having no rights that the United States is bound to respect? [read post]
11 Apr 2007, 7:17 am
As the plaintiffs in BHA v. [read post]
10 Apr 2007, 12:26 pm
Making a non-legal argument, the reply said that "the reputation of the United States is on the line in these novel and untested trials. [read post]
6 Apr 2007, 4:25 am
In United States v. [read post]
5 Apr 2007, 4:21 am
United States v. [read post]
