Search for: "Strange v. Strange"
Results 3581 - 3600
of 3,726
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
26 Jun 2018, 11:57 am
Guns and Ammo: Legally Storing, Moving, and Showing Them OffThe laws surrounding firearms in Canada are not only complex but they also involve a variety of federal laws and provincial regulations. [read post]
8 Jul 2023, 8:32 am
I admit that I'm no expert in the doctrine in this area, though I do watch it out of the corner of my eye, and I can't recall reading a more ridiculous standing decision in the last 10 years or so than the one the Court endorsed in the 303 Creative v. [read post]
26 Jun 2018, 11:57 am
Guns and Ammo: Legally Storing, Moving, and Showing Them Off The laws surrounding firearms in Canada are not only complex but they also involve a variety of federal laws and provincial regulations. [read post]
25 Apr 2017, 1:12 pm
All of the proxies started dancing (you can find most of them on the venerable Google Shill List from the Oracle v. [read post]
24 Oct 2011, 9:43 am
Mullenix, Strange Bedfellows: The Politics of Preemption, 59 Case W. [read post]
25 Oct 2011, 4:30 am
Mullenix, Strange Bedfellows: The Politics of Preemption, 59 Case W. [read post]
22 Dec 2006, 11:31 am
What follows is a compendium of substantive analyses on some of the key issues of the War on Terror by the authors here at Balkinization.The Anti-Torture Memos: Balkinization Posts on Civil Liberties, the War on Terror and Presidential PowerPart I-- Civil LibertiesPart II-- Presidential Power and Constitutional StructurePart III-- Torture and the "Torture Memos"Part IV- The NSA Controversy and Government SurveillancePart V-- HamdanPart VI-- The Military Commissions Act of… [read post]
3 May 2018, 1:50 pm
Quoting the Supreme Court’s opinion in United States v. [read post]
29 Nov 2022, 5:01 am
Historical Practice and AUMF Interpretation The idea that subsequent practice should bear on how one interprets a statute is, in many ways, a strange one. [read post]
27 Mar 2019, 1:00 am
Here is the schedule for the 2019 Health Law Professors Conference. [read post]
15 Nov 2019, 9:00 am
Strong v. weak corporate practice of medicine One of the tricks about corporate practice of medicine is that it varies by state and in some states the corporate practice of medicine is a really big deal. [read post]
4 May 2020, 4:46 pm
In this regard, it is the article 23 ‘restrictions’ clause which is the most central, although strangely this is not acknowledged or even mentioned in GC et al itself. [read post]
3 Aug 2015, 9:01 pm
The legal question for the court in Devorah H. v. [read post]
2 Dec 2012, 11:11 pm
The Leveson report has also created a strange accord (or romance, as Adam Wagner would have it in his post on the subject) between the Daily Mail and the Human Rights Act, with the normally rights-bashing newspaper publishing an interview with Shami Chakrabarti (director of Liberty and advisor to the Leveson Inquiry, who has subsequently clarified her comments) in which she argues that making Ofcom the “backstop regulator” with statutory powers to punish newspapers would violate… [read post]
1 Dec 2015, 9:39 pm
That’s what the case of Fisher v. [read post]
13 Dec 2016, 8:05 am
This long-needed impetus stems from the recent Supreme Court of Canada case of R. v. [read post]
28 Aug 2018, 9:01 pm
Under Miranda v. [read post]
8 Oct 2006, 1:10 pm
United States v. [read post]
2 Mar 2012, 10:17 am
Panel 2—U.S. and EU Perspectives on Trademark and Design Law in the Next Decade Annette Kur, Senior Research Fellow, Max Planck Institute for Intellectual Property and Competition Law; Associate Professor, Stockholm University Two regimes coexisting at the community level and harmonized national law; both regimes are interlinked in terms of prior rights in one creating barriers to rights in another. [read post]
6 May 2023, 2:49 pm
” There seems to be only one relevant precedent: Televest v. [read post]
