Search for: "Strong v. State"
Results 3581 - 3600
of 16,386
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
17 Nov 2018, 12:10 pm
One amicus brief often praised by Plaintiffs’ counsel was submitted by Professor Kenneth Rothman and colleagues.2 This amicus brief is still cited by parties who find support in the brief for their excuses for not having consistent, valid, strong, and statistically significance evidence to support their claims of causation. [read post]
6 Nov 2020, 5:02 am
If the Court wanted to go down the path of emphasizing subjective motivations, it would have decided Trump v. [read post]
3 Oct 2012, 4:07 am
Strong are here. [read post]
30 May 2011, 8:48 am
On Thursday, in United States v. [read post]
12 Jun 2016, 2:43 pm
"On the importance of technical innovation relative to design, I like the following passage from the brief:"To state the obvious, the investment in research and development for information and communication technologies—currently estimated at $250 billion annually—extends well beyond design to include the hardware, software, and services that are incorporated into the technological products. [...] [read post]
3 Apr 2007, 12:32 pm
" A crack-powder disparity argument is rejected under United States v. [read post]
17 Jan 2012, 4:07 pm
Nelson issued a strong dissent. [read post]
28 Jun 2010, 1:48 pm
” “In the Diamond v. [read post]
2 Nov 2012, 9:46 am
The state has a legitimate interest in maintaining its precinct-based voting system; there is a strong public interest that militates against changing the rules during early voting. [read post]
17 Apr 2014, 9:00 am
Recent decisions, such as the order made by the federal court in Indiana last Thursday in Baskin v Bogan to the effect that the state was to recognise immediately out-of-state same-sex marriage, are joining a raft of US decisions that are pushing the issue closer to the steps of the US Supreme Court. [read post]
1 Jul 2013, 9:03 am
Further, the Court decided McQuiggin v. [read post]
5 Apr 2010, 2:27 pm
State Dep’t of Human Servs., 146 N.J. 614, 621 (1996). [read post]
28 Jun 2016, 7:37 am
United States, and, of course, NFIB v. [read post]
8 Sep 2017, 1:10 pm
” That observation dovetails with the Court’s holding in United States v. [read post]
28 May 2014, 8:48 am
Appeals Court Environmental Decisions <> Oklahoma v. [read post]
18 Aug 2017, 6:43 am
This demand, in part, is supported by a strong, growing and consistent RVO and RFS. [read post]
29 Jun 2016, 12:36 pm
Commentary on the four-four tie in United States v. [read post]
12 Jun 2012, 2:00 am
Lord Walker stated that it is “certainly disturbing” [93]. [read post]
8 Jan 2020, 9:29 am
State v. [read post]
23 Jan 2023, 4:00 am
The ruling rested on the proposition that the core of the First Amendment is a very strong presumption against the permissibility of prior restraints on the press. [read post]
