Search for: "US v. Shields"
Results 3581 - 3600
of 4,947
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
25 Jan 2012, 4:00 am
In Capitol Records v. [read post]
24 Jan 2012, 7:29 am
In People v. [read post]
24 Jan 2012, 7:00 am
‘purpose of shielding’, ‘intent to bring the person to justice’), or 17 (3), which already allows the Court to take sentencing considerations into account. [read post]
24 Jan 2012, 5:30 am
Grade: B Super Bowl VII 1972 This logo looks like the basic idea from Super Bowl V was copied and made a bit snazzier. [read post]
24 Jan 2012, 12:01 am
But whatever the rationale, the result seems about right to us. [read post]
23 Jan 2012, 2:00 am
A court in Illinois has ruled that the US-based technology blog, TechnoBuffalo, does not qualifiy for state shield law and must disclose its source’s identity. “The decision against the consumer electronics blog TechnoBuffalo comes just one month after a federal district court in Oregon made a similar ruling regarding a Montana blogger, finding that she did not qualify as a journalist under Oregon’s reporter’s shield law” reports RCFP. [read post]
21 Jan 2012, 9:49 am
One of the useful aspects to the Second Appellate District's decision in In Re Marriage of Hill and Dittmer is that the justices kindly include an Appendix setting forth selected portions of the prenup which were upheld as fully enforceable, providing family law practitioners who draft premarital agreements a useful partial template for language that will likely pass muster. [read post]
19 Jan 2012, 5:45 am
Circuit last week in Software & Information Industry Association v. [read post]
18 Jan 2012, 11:42 am
Abrams says it is Buckley v. [read post]
18 Jan 2012, 8:11 am
The 6-2 decision (with Justice Elena Kagan not taking part) came in the case of Golan, et al., v. [read post]
18 Jan 2012, 6:17 am
Pennsylvania is unusual with respect to the extent that wrongful use of civil proceedings claims, also known as Dragonetti claims, are used not only as a shield but a sword. [read post]
17 Jan 2012, 5:46 am
See Mazza v. [read post]
14 Jan 2012, 12:09 pm
In Beye v. [read post]
13 Jan 2012, 3:00 am
" The Court's Opinion: Fisher v. [read post]
12 Jan 2012, 11:09 pm
A Constitution Bench comprising the Chief Justice and Justices Jain, Nijjar, Khehar and Desai heard arguments this week in Bharat Aluminium v Kaiser Aluminium Technical Services, in which the principal issue is whether Part I of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 applies to arbitrations where the seat of arbitration is outside India. [read post]
12 Jan 2012, 1:15 pm
This footnote strikes us as frankly bizarre. [read post]
12 Jan 2012, 1:05 pm
In a recent medical malpractice decision of note in the case of Locker v. [read post]
11 Jan 2012, 10:30 am
Supreme Court for the first time in Staub v. [read post]
10 Jan 2012, 5:02 pm
So I’m hoping that readers will be equally amused by an export law forfeiture case that is titled United States v. [read post]
9 Jan 2012, 4:27 pm
bas Klubs v. [read post]
