Search for: "United States v. Circuit Judges"
Results 3581 - 3600
of 16,265
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
13 Sep 2019, 11:43 am
The case is the United States and State of California ex rel. [read post]
13 Sep 2019, 11:01 am
Judge Joseph A. [read post]
13 Sep 2019, 11:00 am
For example, the government argues that ending DACA would discourage the flow of undocumented migrants to the United States. [read post]
13 Sep 2019, 6:42 am
Why would the judge refuse to dismiss such a claim when no federal claims remain? [read post]
13 Sep 2019, 6:03 am
United States, the U.S. [read post]
12 Sep 2019, 8:14 am
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit, which had limited the injunction to states within the Ninth Circuit, such as California and Arizona, but excluded Texas and New Mexico, which are outside the circuit. [read post]
12 Sep 2019, 4:02 am
Amy Howe reports at Howe on the Court that the Supreme Court last night “gave the government the go-ahead to enforce a new rule that would bar most immigrants from applying for asylum if they pass through another country – such as Mexico – without seeking asylum there before arriving in the United States … while it appeals a decision by a federal judge in California to the 9th Circuit and, if necessary, the Supreme Court. [read post]
11 Sep 2019, 4:06 pm
See Trump v. [read post]
11 Sep 2019, 8:12 am
” The 5th Circuit adopted this limiting principle in Texas v. [read post]
11 Sep 2019, 6:30 am
Comment. 267 (2000).[7] Petition for a Writ of Certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit at 37-38, app. [read post]
10 Sep 2019, 12:05 pm
Chief Judge Prost began her analysis by citing the two-part eligibility test elaborated by the Federal Circuit in Athena Diagnostics, Inc. v. [read post]
9 Sep 2019, 4:22 pm
(Another circuit had disagreed, but I'll stick to Ninth Circuit caselaw in this post.) (2) Three years later, in United States v. [read post]
9 Sep 2019, 4:00 am
The United States District Court, Southern District of New York, affirming an order of the magistrate judge, rejected the Members' claim that they were entitled to legislative immunity that protects them against being called as witnesses at depositions regardless of whether they are parties in the action and directed the Members to appear for their depositions. [read post]
8 Sep 2019, 12:45 pm
United States, 138 S. [read post]
7 Sep 2019, 4:08 am
Kopf Senior United States District Judge (Nebraska) [i] It may just be me, but heretofore the Fifth Circuit was not known to be particularly amusing. [read post]
6 Sep 2019, 1:13 pm
In United States v. [read post]
Thoughts on the SG’s “Lesbian Comparator” Argument in the Pending Title VII Sexual-Orientation Cases
6 Sep 2019, 5:08 am
Those briefs frame the issue in a particular, familiar way: They assume that the Court’s decision depends upon whether it would violate Title VII for an employer to implement a policy that categorically excludes all persons with same-sex orientation, gay men and lesbians alike, from the workforce—as though the cases involve what a couple of court of appeals judges (Judge Lynch in the Second Circuit and Judge… [read post]
5 Sep 2019, 4:00 pm
For those not within the United States, some individuals with substantial connections to the United States may have some protection. [read post]
3 Sep 2019, 4:29 pm
United States Stanford’s Cyberlaw Blog has considered how the FTC can help safeguard privacy rights with legislative mandates from Congress. [read post]
3 Sep 2019, 11:41 am
In United States v. [read post]
