Search for: "United States v. Mark"
Results 3581 - 3600
of 10,389
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
28 Nov 2017, 4:10 am
Yesterday the justices heard argument in Oil States Energy Services v. [read post]
27 Nov 2017, 6:45 am
Key Precedent Fourteenth Amendment (“All persons born or naturalized in the United States, and subject to the jurisdiction thereof, are citizens of the United States and of the state wherein they reside. [read post]
27 Nov 2017, 4:03 am
The first is Oil States Energy Services v. [read post]
26 Nov 2017, 11:40 pm
There was a counterclaim for, amongst other things, breach of contract and fraudulent misrepresentation but insufficient evidence was provided to support the counterclaims.Beer Pong, as the judge, Mr Fancourt QC, put it "is a game originating in the United States played in pubs and bars and traditionally involving the drinking of beer". [read post]
26 Nov 2017, 4:39 pm
The Strasbourg Observers blog has a post about the Court of Human Rights’ admissibility decision in the case of Tamiz v United Kingdom. [read post]
25 Nov 2017, 8:38 pm
To the extent that Tinker v. [read post]
22 Nov 2017, 2:00 pm
To start at the beginning, the United States is based on a basic proposition: assume everyone who has power is likely to abuse it. [read post]
22 Nov 2017, 12:26 pm
Take bite mark comparisons, for example. [read post]
22 Nov 2017, 10:51 am
Those rules were set aside by the United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit in May, 2017, in the published opinion Taylor v. [read post]
22 Nov 2017, 4:03 am
United States, which asks whether the government must obtain a warrant for cell-site-location information. [read post]
22 Nov 2017, 2:51 am
Those rules were set aside by the United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit in May, 2017, in the published opinion Taylor v. [read post]
21 Nov 2017, 2:13 pm
The application docket is Trump v. [read post]
21 Nov 2017, 10:45 am
In Dahlia v. v. [read post]
21 Nov 2017, 12:26 am
€$€The Authors' Take:-- Disparaging or offensive trademark registrations in the United States Are there any limits after the US Supreme Court's decision in Matal v Tam? [read post]
19 Nov 2017, 4:09 pm
v. [read post]
19 Nov 2017, 5:45 am
Barnes v. [read post]
18 Nov 2017, 2:11 pm
In 2002, the Supreme Court held in United States v. [read post]
17 Nov 2017, 4:01 pm
Two US academics, Eric Goldman and Jeff Kosseff, have put together an interesting collection of articles on Section 230 of the Communications Decency Act and, to mark the twentieth anniversary of the pivotal decision in Zeran v AOL – which they describe as “internet law’s most important decision“. [read post]
17 Nov 2017, 5:54 am
AUSTIN, Magistrate Judge.TO: THE HONORABLE LEE YEAKEL UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGEBefore this Court are Plaintiff's Motion for Summary Judgment (Dkt. [read post]
17 Nov 2017, 5:54 am
AUSTIN, Magistrate Judge.TO: THE HONORABLE LEE YEAKEL UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGEBefore this Court are Plaintiff's Motion for Summary Judgment (Dkt. [read post]
