Search for: "Wal-Mart StoresĀ " Results 3581 - 3600 of 3,713
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
29 Jun 2009, 5:05 pm
Adverse possession doesn't usually foster strong lasting relationships or encourage party invitations.Banana Peel (Ode to Anjou) (to the tune of Lucy in the Sky with Diamonds by Lennon and McCartney and performed by The Beatles)Picture yourself in a store produce sectionWith tangerine standsAnd things to stir frySomebody shouts outYou turn rather quicklyBanana peel plus a tall guyManagers quickly rush to the bad sceneStretchers to take him awayLook to Anjou for support and he' [read post]
7 Oct 2013, 6:44 am by Joy Waltemath
The case is Heimeshoff v Hartford Life & Accident Insurance Co. and Wal-Mart Stores, Inc (Dkt No 12-729) In an unpublished opinion, the Second Circuit affirmed a lower court’s decision that the plaintiff’s claim for long-term disability benefits was untimely because she filed her action outside the policy-prescribed, three-year statute of limitations period. [read post]
11 Feb 2012, 9:51 am by Rebecca Tushnet
  Though P is not the retail store at which Zeidenberg bought the CD. [read post]
5 Jun 2017, 5:19 am by Rebecca Tushnet
One of the tables had a sticker showing it was sold by Wal-Mart for $247. [read post]
12 Aug 2014, 9:22 pm by H. Scott Leviant
It is a bit belated, but I'm getting some write-ups of the big cases up for your reading pleasure (or agony). [read post]
29 Oct 2019, 7:10 am by Aditi Shah
First, because the Ninth Circuit already recognized that some class members in this case may not have a constitutional right to bond hearings, the class may no longer satisfy the Supreme Court’s standard articulated in Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. v. [read post]
13 Mar 2013, 5:23 am by Rebecca Tushnet
I’m happy to bring you a guest post about the Supreme Court’s recent Amgen case, which deals with class action certification along with materiality, which plays a distinctive role in securities litigation but which should still be of interest to advertising litigators given the presumptions of materiality some states allow. [read post]
22 Sep 2013, 8:35 am by Susan Schneider
This year’s LL.M. class is a diverse and talented group of attorneys with law degrees from the UCLA, the University of Colorado, Indiana University, Vermont Law School, the University of Londrina in Brazil, the University of Arkansas at Little Rock (William Bowen School of Law), Arizona State University, the University of South Carolina, and, our own University of Arkansas School of Law. [read post]
20 Dec 2011, 2:38 pm by Geoffrey Manne
It’s a little like condemning Target for deigning to use its trucks to supply inventory only to its own stores instead of Wal-Mart’s, or, say, condemning a congressman for targeting earmarks for his own state or district. [read post]
30 Aug 2013, 12:28 pm by Dan Harris
China also reaches to Ludington, where we go to get groceries at either Meijer’s or Wal-Mart, either of which probably qualify as the largest store to which I have ever been, and both of which are, of course, stocked with clothing, electronics, food, and pretty much everything else from China. [read post]
6 Sep 2011, 1:56 am by Kevin LaCroix
  And finally, on June 20, 2011 the Court held in the Wal-Mart Stores v. [read post]
11 Jan 2017, 7:02 am by Gerald Maatman, Jr.
Plaintiffs’ lawyers continued to craft refined and more successful class certification theories to counter the more stringent Rule 23 certification requirements established in Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. v. [read post]
17 Jul 2019, 2:04 pm by Kevin LaCroix
As I have previously noted, even though the Foreign Corrupt Practices Act (FCPA) does not contain a private right of action, plaintiffs’ attorneys have fashioned an FCPA-based claim of sorts in the form of a follow-on shareholder claim alleging either mismanagement or misrepresentation with respect to the alleged bribery or corrupt activity. [read post]
5 Jan 2012, 7:31 am by Max Kennerly, Esq.
 Antitrust law in general has been in the doldrums lately, after a string of hostile Supreme Court opinions, ranging from the egregious Twombly decision, in which the Supreme Court ignored the facts alleged by the plaintiffs’ complaint in favor of an alternative reality in which telecommunications is actually a very competitive industry, to the Wal-Mart v. [read post]