Search for: "CHANCE v. STATE" Results 3601 - 3620 of 12,117
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
15 Dec 2017, 2:00 am by Christopher Tyner
  There’s evidence of the value Jamie’s work in the recent North Carolina Supreme Court case State v. [read post]
14 Dec 2017, 1:00 pm by Stewart Baker
 As Justice Scalia noted in his dissent in Morrison v. [read post]
12 Dec 2017, 6:52 am by Joy Waltemath
American Federation of State, County, and Municipal Employees, Council 31 (16-1466), takes the opposite position from DOJ’s amicus brief filed two years earlier, in Friedrichs v California Teachers Association (14-915), to argue that it is time to overturn Abood v. [read post]
11 Dec 2017, 3:28 am by Peter Mahler
 After 1997, when the IRS adopted check-the-box regulations cementing pass-through partnership tax treatment for LLCs, New York and other states flipped the default rule, i.e., members are no longer permitted to withdraw unless authorized by the operating agreement. [read post]
9 Dec 2017, 5:06 am by Mark S. Humphreys
  Trying to keep the case in State or County Court is most favorable for the homeowner. [read post]
6 Dec 2017, 7:54 am by Vivian Robinson
However, adopting this procedure may provide both corporates and lawyers with a good chance that the material in question will properly carry the cloak of privilege. [read post]
5 Dec 2017, 12:01 pm by Tim Springer
A claimant’s impairment is “severe” if it meets the standard of Stone v. [read post]
4 Dec 2017, 9:01 pm by Joanna L. Grossman
The law didn’t have a chance of being upheld given the Supreme Court’s abortion jurisprudence. [read post]
4 Dec 2017, 7:59 am by First Mondays
This week, we preview Masterpiece Cakeshop, Ltd. v. [read post]
3 Dec 2017, 4:04 pm by INFORRM
Michael Geist’s blog has a post Canada’s Missing Internet Provision: Why NAFTA Offers the Chance to Establish Long Overdue Online Speech Safeguards In the case of Vanderveen v Waterbridge Media Inc., 2017 CanLII 77435 the claimant recovered damages for invasion of privacy arising out of the use of a footage of her jogging in a commercial video. [read post]