Search for: "Call v. State" Results 3601 - 3620 of 55,484
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
6 Dec 2016, 1:45 am by Blog Editorial
  Lord Pannick QC says it is no answer for the Government to say that the long title to the 1972 Act “says nothing about withdrawal“. 16:04: Lord Pannick QC refers to the case of Robinson v Secretary of State for Northern Ireland, which he submits supports a “flexible response” to constitutional developments. [read post]
1 Jun 2011, 8:17 am by clee
Judicial Watch President Tom Fitton and Judicial Watch client Arizona State Senate President Russell Pearce offered the following statements today regarding the Supreme Court’s decision upholding the constitutionality of Arizona’s “Legal Arizona Workers Act,” legislation crafted by Pearce to penalize Arizona businesses that knowingly hire illegal aliens (Chamber of Commerce v. [read post]
24 Feb 2011, 4:00 am
Bosland is the author of A Federal Sector Guide to the Family and Medical Leave Act & Related Litigation.In Terwilliger v. [read post]
1 Mar 2024, 3:30 am by Liz Dunshee
” The rulemaking petition says that the 2023 decision in Slack Technologies, LLC v. [read post]
This means that neither the president nor Congress can directly require states and cities to call off their “shelter-in-place” orders, or to reopen schools and businesses. [read post]
14 Dec 2009, 10:44 am
A Service from the ABA Criminal Justice Section, http://www.abanet.org/crimjust Michigan v. [read post]
22 Mar 2013, 3:02 pm by Bruce Boyden
It is what in torts is called “reason to know” of a fact. [read post]