Search for: "Chambers v. State"
Results 3601 - 3620
of 4,825
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
9 Mar 2023, 12:07 pm
Dep’t of Justice, Ericsson Agrees to Pay Over $1 Billion to Resolve FCPA Case (December 6, 2019), https://www.justice.gov/opa/pr/ericsson-agrees-pay-over-1-billion-resolve-fcpa-case. [3] Deferred Prosecution Agreement, United States v. [read post]
29 Apr 2010, 12:14 pm
And how do you square Terry v. [read post]
30 Jul 2010, 10:12 am
Chamber of Commerce v. [read post]
11 Nov 2007, 11:40 pm
What are states going to do?... [read post]
5 May 2011, 2:17 am
The Curia website brings news of the appeal which has been lodged by Chocoladefabriken Lindt & Sprüngli AG against the judgment of the General Court (First Chamber) in Case T-336/08 Chocoladefabriken Lindt & Sprüngli AG v Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs). [read post]
11 Aug 2010, 2:21 pm
Justice Jim Johnson poo-poos science: Date: July 22, 2010 Contact: Brendan Williams, (360) 791-3979 In 2005’s Ferry County v. [read post]
30 Apr 2018, 9:29 am
In Lamps Plus, Inc. v. [read post]
5 May 2010, 5:17 pm
Hugh Tomlinson QC is a member of Matrix Chambers and of the Inforrm Committee. [read post]
11 Sep 2008, 12:00 pm
Although, this concept is not really new: since 1993, Chinese courts have made efforts to establish special trial chambers of IP. [read post]
6 Oct 2011, 10:47 am
On other fronts portending additional litigation, the California Chamber of Commerce, and other state industry groups have alleged, and continue to allege, that the state's plan to sell GHG allowances under its cap-and-trade program amounts to a tax requiring two-thirds (2/3) approval of the California Legislature. [read post]
6 Oct 2011, 10:47 am
On other fronts portending additional litigation, the California Chamber of Commerce, and other state industry groups have alleged, and continue to allege, that the state's plan to sell GHG allowances under its cap-and-trade program amounts to a tax requiring two-thirds (2/3) approval of the California Legislature. [read post]
13 Oct 2008, 12:12 pm
ECJ clarifies rules relating to notice: K-Swiss Inc v OHIM (Class 46) EU Competitiveness Council resolution against counterfeiting and piracy (Class 46) EU states back three-point anti-piracy plan (Managing Intellectual Property) Fuel cells and wind power lead European patent filings for clean energy technology (Green Patent Blog) More non-minor geographical indicator (GI) amendments published (Class 46) No sign of any Community patent progress, despite Verheugen's optimism… [read post]
14 Jul 2019, 4:56 pm
Surveillance The Grand Chamber of the European Court of Human Rights held a hearing in the case of Big Brother Watch and Others v. the United Kingdom. [read post]
18 Mar 2024, 3:52 am
United States The House of Representatives have passed the Foreign Adversary Controlled Applications Act, a bill which has been characterised as having the power to ban TikTok. [read post]
13 Jul 2023, 12:06 pm
Biden v. [read post]
24 Jun 2011, 3:25 pm
Summers v. [read post]
20 Apr 2011, 2:14 am
Among the reasons frequently cited for the higher incidence of litigation in the United States compared to the rest of the world is the acceptability of contingent fees for plaintiffs’ counsel and general rules that each party to a lawsuit in the U.S. bears its own costs. [read post]
6 Jan 2022, 12:21 am
The claimant said that by stating in their trade mark application their bona fide intention to use the mark, they caused the public to believe they were associated with the claimant. [read post]
21 Apr 2025, 6:50 am
In cases such as Youngstown Sheet & Tube Co. v. [read post]
2 Oct 2023, 1:51 am
Australians being sued for defamation may miss out on new defences depending on which state or territory law applies, prompting renewed calls for the federal government to step in to pass national defamation laws. [read post]
