Search for: "Chief Justice of the United States"
Results 3601 - 3620
of 14,929
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
5 Mar 2013, 8:09 am
By: Gene Quinn (IPWatchdog.com) Last week, the United States Supreme Court heard oral arguments in the matter of Bowman v. [read post]
25 Jul 2017, 3:06 am
Scott Bomboy is the editor in chief of the National Constitution Center. [read post]
28 Mar 2012, 5:33 pm
See United States v. [read post]
6 Feb 2017, 12:38 pm
Two decades after writing the landmark United States v. [read post]
26 Apr 2018, 9:04 am
Ogden was the needed guarantee,” one scholar of Chief Justice John Marshall has observed, “that interstate rail, telephone and telegraph, oil and gas pipe lines might be built across state lines without the threat of local interference from state action. [read post]
3 Apr 2013, 11:45 am
Perry (challenging California’s Proposition 8) and United States v. [read post]
6 May 2007, 3:01 pm
(a) Jane Sullivan Roberts, partner, Pillsbury Winthrop (b) Philip Perry, partner, Latham & Watkins (b) Fred Fielding, White House Counsel (c) John Roberts, Chief Justice of the United States (d) All of the Above The answer: (D)! [read post]
6 May 2007, 6:32 pm
(a) Jane Sullivan Roberts, partner, Pillsbury Winthrop (b) Philip Perry, partner, Latham & Watkins (c) Fred Fielding, White House Counsel (d) John Roberts, Chief Justice of the United States (e) All of the Above The answer: (e)! [read post]
26 Jun 2014, 8:02 am
California and United States v. [read post]
23 Feb 2023, 8:16 am
Knesset chief legal advisor Sagit Afik, however, opposed the inclusion of certain parts of the reform package dealing with the binding effects of legal interpretations provided by government legal advisors in a draft Basic Law. [read post]
1 Nov 2021, 4:30 pm
Jackson and United States v. [read post]
25 Mar 2008, 7:10 am
In rejecting the Mexican nationals’ reliance on the World Court’s decision, the Chief Justice wrote that the ruling did impose “an international obligation on the part of the United States. [read post]
1 Oct 2010, 11:39 am
Photo credit: Steve Petteway, Collection of the Supreme Court of the United States Photo credit: Steve Petteway, Collection of the Supreme Court of the United States Photo credit: Steve Petteway, Collection of the Supreme Court of the United States [read post]
3 Sep 2017, 5:47 pm
But rehearing would be required in any event because the bias injected into the proceedings by Justice Hearn tainted not only her conclusions, but those of Acting Justice Pleicones and of Chief Justice Beatty, as well.In a nutshell, the fault exposed by the petition for rehearing is this: there is no 3-2 majority, or any majority, of the Court that is united in favor of any reasoning for any result that is dispositive of the entire case. [read post]
3 Sep 2017, 5:47 pm
But rehearing would be required in any event because the bias injected into the proceedings by Justice Hearn tainted not only her conclusions, but those of Acting Justice Pleicones and of Chief Justice Beatty, as well.In a nutshell, the fault exposed by the petition for rehearing is this: there is no 3-2 majority, or any majority, of the Court that is united in favor of any reasoning for any result that is dispositive of the entire case. [read post]
8 Mar 2024, 1:45 pm
" In a per curiam opinion jointly authored by five justices, including Chief Justice John Roberts, the Court ruled that only Congress, acting through legislation, has the power to determine who is disqualified and under what procedures. [read post]
2 Mar 2011, 3:24 pm
United States. [read post]
29 Dec 2007, 1:07 pm
Exxon Mobil Corp. and three affiliated companies, including a natural gas subsidiary in Indonesia, on Thursday asked Chief Justice John G. [read post]
30 Apr 2018, 2:29 pm
Justice Kennedy was joined only by the Chief Justice and Justice Thomas in Parts II(A), (B)(2)-(3) and III. [read post]
7 Aug 2012, 12:56 pm
Then in 1994, in United States v. [read post]
