Search for: "Child v. Child" Results 3601 - 3620 of 31,256
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
12 Sep 2008, 7:13 pm
Also affirmed denial of abatement of child support during dad's 4 week summer parenting time; and Castle v. [read post]
28 Jul 2008, 8:50 am
Coleman v Attridge Law and another (Case C-303/06); [2008] WLR (D) 257 “The person whose disability gave rise to direct discrimination against an employee, so as to constitute an infringement of Directive 2000/78 on equal treatment and occupation, could in principle be a disabled child of the employee, and was not limited to the employee himself, and the same was true of harassment of the employee. [read post]
22 May 2008, 4:35 am
SB v A County Council [2008] EWCA Civ 535; [2008] WLR (D) 160 “A judge considering dispensing with parental consent to adoption had to focus on the child's welfare ‘throughout his life’, to emphasise that adoption, unlike other forms of order, was something with lifelong implications. [read post]
19 Dec 2013, 5:45 am by K.O. Herston
Russell (herstontennesseefamilylaw.com) Alimony From Other Parent Not Considered Income for Child Support Purposes in Chattanooga: Ghorashi-Bajestani v. [read post]
4 Jun 2009, 1:35 am
Regina (G) v Southwark London Borough Council House of Lords “A local authority's children's services unit could not purport to fulfil its duties to look after a homeless child merely by referring him to the homeless persons unit. [read post]
12 May 2009, 2:04 am
Regina (M) v East Sussex County Council Queen’s Bench Division “The failure by a local authority to amend a child's statement of special educational needs during the year of his transfer between phases of schooling, and to name and specify the type of school was a breach of its statutory obligation. [read post]
21 May 2009, 2:03 am
Regina (G) v Southwark London Borough Council [2009] UKHL 26; [2009] WLR (D) 159 “When a child aged 16 or 17 who had been excluded from his family home applied to the children's service department of the local authority for accommodation under s 20 of the Children Act 1989, and he satisfied all the requirements of [...] [read post]
14 Apr 2008, 1:35 am
Wakefield Metropolitan District Council v T Court of Appeal “A child supervision order had an initial life of 12 months and could be extended for a further two years maximum. [read post]