Search for: "Cost v. Cost" Results 3601 - 3620 of 48,955
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
2 Dec 2022, 6:30 am by Guest Blogger
In a country (and culture) that sometimes appears to believe that prevention of even one terrorist attack justifies immense costs in terms both of money and deprivations of ordinary liberty, it is at least worth noting the remarkable indifference of much of the public—and certainly the whole of the Republican Party—to the costs attached to offering the kind of capacious interpretation of the Second Amendment instantiated in the recent case of New York State Rifle &… [read post]
2 Dec 2022, 1:00 am by CMS
In this post, Sophie Campbell, an Associate in the litigation team at CMS, previews the decision awaited from the Supreme Court in Sara & Hossein Asset Holdings Ltd v Blacks Outdoor Retail Ltd. [read post]
30 Nov 2022, 9:05 pm by Taylor Ross
In San Antonio Independent School District v. [read post]
30 Nov 2022, 6:35 pm by Chip Merlin
Please note, it is Liberty Mutual’s continued position that the Connecticut Supreme Court’s decision in Kellogg v. [read post]
30 Nov 2022, 3:30 pm by Paul Willetts
“ The article considers the implications of a recent employment law decision from the Court of Appeal for Ontario (Lake v. [read post]
30 Nov 2022, 6:04 am by Steve Lubet
Thomas has ultimately succeeded at a long game, but his victory comes at a severe cost. [read post]
29 Nov 2022, 5:00 pm
When costs and time spent laundering their uniforms outside of work hours are accounted for, these employees allege that they earn less than the prevailing minimum wage.Since DNATA has earned hundreds of millions in revenue as a result of its workers’ efforts, the litigation seeks to recoup appropriate compensation, together with an award of legal fees and costs.We sense some turbulence ahead ....# # #SOURCECurtis v DNATA Aviation USA, Inc. [read post]
29 Nov 2022, 1:55 pm by Amy Howe
When Prelogar responded that they would not, Roberts reminded her of the court’s recent decision in Biden v. [read post]