Search for: "D, Otherwise C. v. C"
Results 3601 - 3620
of 4,550
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
9 Sep 2008, 2:25 pm
Hernandez, No. 071828 In criminal defendant's objection to two-point sentencing enhancement, sentence including period of criminal supervision for conspiracy to distribute heroin is affirmed where: 1) defendant "committed the instant offense while under a[] criminal justice sentence," USSG section 4A1.1(d); and 2) the district court appropriately elevated his criminal history score by two points on that account. [read post]
2 Aug 2022, 6:30 am
Consider Dobbs v. [read post]
26 Jul 2018, 11:16 am
Yet the order (narrowed on appeal to 50 feet, but still unconstitutional) seems to have been based on pretty normal -- if acrimonious -- local political debate. [read post]
22 Sep 2020, 4:17 pm
Sanchez v. [read post]
9 Feb 2009, 5:34 pm
v. [read post]
31 Jan 2024, 2:30 pm
[c.] [read post]
30 Nov 2017, 4:26 am
Ltd. v. [read post]
30 Mar 2018, 2:24 am
., Demleitner, Nora V., et al. [read post]
21 Feb 2022, 2:37 pm
From Del Castillo v. [read post]
7 Jan 2009, 12:54 pm
Everyone assumed you would win the contract – but the fax says otherwise. [read post]
5 Aug 2019, 7:41 pm
§541(b)(8)(C). [read post]
31 Aug 2018, 9:14 am
, United States v. [read post]
7 Feb 2011, 5:56 pm
Year end pool financial statements must disclose specific income and fee information for investee pools as specified in Regulation 4.22(c)(5). [read post]
25 Jun 2009, 4:29 am
Pennfield Oil Co., 2008 WL 1990783, at *9 (D. [read post]
20 Nov 2007, 1:31 pm
A copy of the filed complaint can be referenced below: IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE SEVENTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT WINNEBAGO COUNTY, ILLINOIS JANE DOE, as mother and next friend of JOHN DOE, a minor, Plaintiff, v. [read post]
21 Feb 2019, 4:00 am
Court of Appeal’s ruling in R. v. [read post]
10 Jan 2018, 2:17 pm
The government has conceded that the court should take that case, so you’d better get used to hearing about it. [read post]
22 May 2014, 7:15 am
Donald and Rochelle Sterling, the LA Clippers, Racism, and California Family Law: An Outsider's Brief Legal Analysis By: Michael C. [read post]
5 Oct 2022, 12:09 pm
The FTT had found a) these were tenancies, b) the property was an unlicensed HMO, c) Ms Cabo’s account was so implausible that the FTT concluded she was receiving a rack rent and so was a person in control of the HMO, and d) she was a person managing the HMO because but for her husband’s company she would be entitled to receive the rents. [read post]
27 Mar 2012, 1:27 pm
Reilly v. [read post]
