Search for: "DOES I-X"
Results 3601 - 3620
of 7,433
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
21 Jul 2010, 8:44 am
Title X creates the Bureau of Consumer Financial Protection. [read post]
15 Nov 2011, 2:41 pm
Updated x 2 | Today, guardian.co.uk’s Comment is Free (CIF) was “taken over” by the Occupy London movement. [read post]
30 Apr 2013, 4:41 pm
What Nine-Month Job Data Does, and Does Not, Tell Us The data from my study is significantly different from the nine-month data for each class. [read post]
4 Mar 2012, 12:47 pm
“Well, the law says x,” where x is some specific word, or phrase. [read post]
30 Mar 2016, 9:01 pm
Suppose that the minimum wage in country 1 is $x, while the minimum wage in country 2 is less than $x. [read post]
26 Feb 2012, 9:14 am
(08/29/09) Even though one of the jurors (who actually does litigation) described the cross-x and closing arguments as the “highlight” of my performance.Our coach went up to the (bankruptcy lawyer) judge after the competition to ask wtf she was thinking, and she claimed to have never heard of the phrase “opening the door” or understanding what it meant Before having to wake up at 6am to get to the airport His nickname for him here comes from the very… [read post]
16 May 2011, 4:13 pm
X or Y. [read post]
11 Dec 2009, 7:09 am
I'll provide a very abbreviated intro to the issue and then a few observations. [read post]
28 Jun 2019, 11:18 am
The power to do X is not also a power to impede X. [read post]
11 Dec 2023, 4:37 pm
Two weeks ago, I filed an amicus brief in U.S. [read post]
5 Mar 2009, 4:05 pm
You pay (1-x)% of something, and we pay x% of it. [read post]
15 Sep 2019, 7:51 pm
Like other elements of context, the mischief rule does not reduce discretion; it does not exclude interpretive options, and it may even expand them. [read post]
17 Nov 2010, 7:58 pm
I invite you to become a follower. [read post]
16 Dec 2014, 7:30 am
That is, to the extent that there are many places where document X has been published, the damage suffered by Sony on account of my republication of document X diminishes. [read post]
8 May 2014, 1:34 pm
But I wonder if the principle can be easily cabined. [read post]
2 Mar 2018, 9:11 am
Once that assumption is in place, then you can ask, what does the sequence of puffs mean (it will only be a sequence rather than something random if that condition is met); but without that assumption in place, the question of meaning does not and cannot arise. [read post]
2 Mar 2018, 9:11 am
Once that assumption is in place, then you can ask, what does the sequence of puffs mean (it will only be a sequence rather than something random if that condition is met); but without that assumption in place, the question of meaning does not and cannot arise. [read post]
5 May 2008, 6:05 am
Our faithful correspondent has several well-taken points, which I'd like to reiterate: On the billable hour model, revenue = (rates) x (hours) x (realization) Add in a dimension for profitability, namely (^leverage) And you realize that each of these four measures has some intrinsic ceiling or maximum on it: Rates: $1,000/hour? [read post]
6 Oct 2010, 8:53 pm
While I approve of that principle, I think it does not make any sense to introduce it in Japan only for copyright and trademark claims. [read post]
10 Mar 2007, 12:35 pm
So where does he go wrong? [read post]
