Search for: "Doe Defendants 1 to 20"
Results 3601 - 3620
of 8,960
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
1 Sep 2008, 9:42 pm
Applying my summer camp theory to my job situation, my fears were: (1) what if I was unhappy when I was a public defender, but I've already forgotten it and convinced myself that I liked it? [read post]
21 May 2014, 4:46 am
It stated, insofar as is relevant here,`1. [read post]
8 Dec 2008, 12:12 pm
Defendant 1 had been charged with the April 20, 2007, bank robbery. [read post]
11 Feb 2013, 6:00 am
She is the author of the #1 selling book on cost containment, Workers Compensation Management Program: Reduce Costs 20% to 50%. [read post]
27 Jun 2013, 12:34 pm
Scientific discourse does pose problems for the fact/opinion divide. [read post]
5 Jul 2018, 5:00 pm
For example, if the case is settled for higher than the $2 million threshold, any amount over $2 million would be charged at 20 percent while the amounts between $1 million and $2 million are charged at 30 percent. [read post]
30 Jan 2017, 7:55 am
The decision does not explain why the exemption was issued or exactly what changed. [read post]
17 Jul 2009, 12:29 pm
Definition of hate crime: 1. [read post]
16 Apr 2009, 5:52 am
Co., 21 Misc 3d 1 [App Term, 2d & 11th Jud Dists 2008]). [read post]
14 Oct 2008, 11:44 am
Cooey and a co-defendant were convicted in the sexual assaults and slayings of University of Akron students Dawn McCreery, 20, and Wendy Offredo, 21, in September 1986. [read post]
16 Apr 2015, 12:38 pm
Morgan was arrested about 1:20 a.m. on suspicion of driving under the influence of alcohol in the area of Interstate 805 and Clairemont Mesa. [read post]
10 Feb 2017, 8:29 pm
Blount, Inc. (1999) 20 Cal.4th 1103, 1109.) [read post]
24 Feb 2020, 9:01 pm
After selecting the motion type, a lawyer indicates whether they are representing the plaintiff or defendant. [read post]
16 Jul 2014, 8:26 am
(This is applying §43(a)(1)(B) puffery analysis to a §43(a)(1)(A), but given that this should be a §43(a)(1)(B) claim, I’m not too saddened.) [read post]
28 Nov 2015, 4:07 pm
The majority decided that the conviction could not stand, on the grounds that the “reasonable person” standard was not appropriate for a criminal case and “[f]ederal criminal liability generally does not turn solely on the results of an act without considering the defendant’s mental state. [read post]
21 Apr 2009, 12:41 pm
., No. 3658-VCS (April 20, 2009), read opinion here. [read post]
31 Aug 2021, 11:58 am
Specifically, Purdue for Senate wants the FCC to rule that “the delivery of a voice message directly to a voicemail box through RVM technology does not constitute a ‘call’ subject to prohibitions on the use of an automatic telephone dialing system (“ATDS”) or an artificial or prerecorded voice under Section 227(b)(1)(A)(iii) of the TCPA or Section 64.1200(a)(1)(iii) of the FCC’s rules. [read post]
6 Feb 2012, 10:00 pm
The case thus provides binding authority (assuming the California Supreme Court does not grant review) that employers can cite when arguing that the plaintiff's trial plan improperly deprives the defendant of due process. [read post]
1 Jul 2024, 5:11 am
Blinken , No. 20-5076 (D.C. [read post]
16 Oct 2014, 1:16 pm
Mutual next argues that the district court erred by granting summary judgment for Tyco with respect to Mutual’s sham-litigation claim because Tyco lacked a reasonable prospect of success in defending the validity of its patents. [read post]
