Search for: "Doe Defendants I through V"
Results 3601 - 3620
of 12,262
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
19 Jan 2023, 8:30 am
Shortly thereafter, the officer observed defendant speed through a stop sign, and the officer followed. [read post]
10 Jul 2013, 7:18 am
In this week’s case (Roy v. [read post]
18 Sep 2015, 9:02 am
Eugene has already blogged [here] about the 11th Circuit’s decision in the case of Katz v. [read post]
22 Aug 2008, 2:53 am
National Wildlife Federation v. [read post]
28 Jan 2010, 9:43 am
Download CRT v Barr. [read post]
13 Jun 2014, 12:51 pm
State v. [read post]
15 Jun 2017, 3:43 pm
Art I, Sec. [read post]
31 May 2016, 4:49 am
Qadan v Tehseldar: No More Personal Liability? [read post]
20 May 2016, 1:15 pm
I’m delighted to report that the Michigan Court of Appeals has just upheld a Twitter parodist’s First Amendment claim in the “badass lawyer” case, Levitt v. [read post]
2 Aug 2023, 5:36 am
There, that court found that, “[w]hereas … [i]nstitutional [b]uyers reasonably expected that [the defendant crypto-asset company] would use the capital it received from its sales to improve the [crypto-asset] ecosystem and thereby increase the price of [the crypto-asset],” those who purchased their coins through secondary transactions had no reasonable basis to expect the same. . . . [read post]
26 Dec 2023, 2:17 pm
Milwaukee I's logic effectively decides the merits in favor of the defendants in API v. [read post]
16 Jan 2015, 12:30 pm
But I hope that, in doing so, it does not malign the majority of voters in a majority of states as irrationally prejudiced. [read post]
17 Nov 2020, 11:23 am
Third Party Doctrine Supreme Court Decision in US v Jones US v. [read post]
11 Aug 2009, 4:22 pm
State v. [read post]
21 Feb 2008, 3:17 pm
I. [read post]
6 May 2015, 4:32 am
On October 8, 2014, Barry -- through counsel -- served a Request to Produce Documents (the `Request’) on Paula's divorce attorney, defendant Jay Frank. [read post]
27 Apr 2024, 2:40 pm
In deciding such immunity questions, the Court assumes that the statute in question does validly bind the defendant and that he violated it--just as it did in Fitzgerald, and just as it does in qualified immunity cases. [read post]
25 Dec 2020, 8:31 pm
Other junior judges may not care enough to step up to defend it. [read post]
12 Nov 2008, 11:44 am
Four years after Crawford v. [read post]
17 May 2016, 5:06 am
Shire City Herbals, Inc. v. [read post]
