Search for: "Does, A-H"
Results 3601 - 3620
of 16,610
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
29 Mar 2009, 10:21 am
The Court also explained that the prescription does not need to be given to the "ultimate user" for it to be issued under section (h). [read post]
22 Feb 2012, 4:55 pm
Does your company have an immigration compliance policy? [read post]
5 Dec 2009, 11:00 am
Why does mediation work? [read post]
28 Dec 2013, 3:25 pm
(Jonathan H. [read post]
20 Sep 2014, 7:19 pm
Federal Information Technology Acquisition Reform Act - Title I: Management of Information Technology Within Federal Government - (Sec. 101) Modifies the current framework governing the management of information technology (IT) within the federal government to require presidential appointment or designation of the Chief Information Officer (CIO) in the following federal agencies: Department of Agriculture (USDA), Department of Commerce, Department of Defense (DOD), Department of Education,… [read post]
27 Jul 2010, 4:02 am
Thomas H. [read post]
23 Aug 2011, 5:08 pm
" ** Michael H. [read post]
17 May 2010, 1:36 pm
An excellent news review was posted by Amanda Coyne in the Alaska Dispatch titled Does Alaska have standing to sue over health care? [read post]
13 Apr 2015, 5:04 pm
While such liability could result in additional direct spending, CBO does not have sufficient basis to estimate the type or frequency of violations or budgetary impact that might occur if the legislation was enacted. [read post]
8 Jul 2008, 5:04 pm
The OOH does not indicate that this type of position falls under another occupational category, which may be eligible for TN visa status. [read post]
10 Feb 2009, 12:25 pm
There does not appear to be an Italian version - even though this is the original language of the opinion. [read post]
16 Oct 2008, 1:51 pm
" 8 C.F.R. s. 214.6 (h) (1) (iii).The new rule does not modify the total period of time an individual may be in TN visa status. [read post]
18 Apr 2012, 10:00 am
Does it matter if Mr. [read post]
10 Oct 2017, 10:13 am
Additionally, Items 4(k) and 5(b) of Part IV on Schedule H and Item 4(j) of Part II on Schedule I ask if any assets were transferred to another plan. [read post]
10 Oct 2017, 10:13 am
Additionally, Items 4(k) and 5(b) of Part IV on Schedule H and Item 4(j) of Part II on Schedule I ask if any assets were transferred to another plan. [read post]
22 Aug 2018, 9:00 am
The letter does give you a limited time reply before you must formally stop. [read post]
24 Aug 2016, 12:11 pm
” But where in all this does a court interpret the law and say what it is? [read post]
26 Nov 2018, 3:09 pm
The Court does not make this decision lightly. [read post]
21 Mar 2016, 11:10 am
The court offered three explanations to support its holding that the Second Amendment does not extend to stun guns. [read post]
18 Nov 2013, 8:52 pm
(Jonathan H. [read post]
