Search for: "Does 1 - 38" Results 3601 - 3620 of 4,952
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
22 May 2011, 5:17 pm by Jeralyn
Does hot pursuit of a fleeing suspect extend this far? [read post]
22 May 2011, 4:03 am
ConclusionThe Hearing Officer found that claims 1, 4 to 7, 32 and 35 to 38 lacked novelty and that claims 1, 2 and 4 to 61 lacked an inventive step in the light of prior art. [read post]
20 May 2011, 8:51 am by Molly Foley-Healy
An individual does not have the right to place solar panels on: (1) property owned by another person; (2) property which is leased by the individual; (3) limited common elements of an association; (4) general common elements of an association; and on (5) property which is collateral for a commercial loan – without permission of the secured party. [read post]
19 May 2011, 1:00 pm by McNabb Associates, P.C.
Article 5 bars extradition when the person sought has been convicted or acquitted in the Requested State for the same offense, but does not bar extradition if the authorities in the Requested State have decided not to prosecute or have decided to discontinue criminal proceedings against the person sought. [read post]
18 May 2011, 12:10 pm by litigationtech
While iPhone or other Android device users will likely feel at home with the Nexus, it's still a good idea to make sure the phone does what you need it to do before you really need to do it. [read post]
17 May 2011, 4:34 pm by Eric Schweibenz
  Specifically, the Commission determined to review:  (1) the ALJ’s construction of the claim term “oven;” (2) the ALJ’s construction of the claim term “sawing;” (3) the ALJ’s determination that the accused process does not infringe, either literally or under the doctrine of equivalents, claims 12, 15, 31-32, 34-35, and 38-39 of the ‘614 patent or claim 1 of the ‘942 patent; (4) the ALJ’s… [read post]
17 May 2011, 12:52 pm by Daniel Richardson
Herring, 2011 VT 38 By Zak Griefen If you commit a heinous crime against your child that (1) leads to your divorce and (2) lands you in jail, can you get out of your spousal maintenance and child support obligations by arguing that your incarceration (and resulting lack of income) is an unanticipated change in circumstances? [read post]
16 May 2011, 8:08 pm by The Legal Blog
Justice KG BalakrishnanThe Supreme Court in Selvi & Ors. v State of Karnataka has examined the law relating to the involuntary administration of certain scientific techniques, namely narcoanalysis, polygraph examination and the Brain Electrical Activation Profile (BEAP) test for the purpose of improving investigation efforts in criminal cases. [read post]
16 May 2011, 9:43 am by Eric Schweibenz
  Specifically, ALJ Rogers determined that the accused Kodak products do not infringe (1) claims 1, 3, 5, 7, and 8 of the ‘964 patent, and (2) claims 15, 27, 30, and 38 of the ‘911 patent. [read post]
10 May 2011, 1:28 pm by PJ Blount
Paragraph (a) does not prevent or limit the liability 41 of a spaceflight entity if the spaceflight entity does any one 42 or more of the following: 43 1.? [read post]
9 May 2011, 11:17 am by The Legal Blog
Sharfuddin [1916] 38 All. 212 is similar in principle to the present case. [read post]
9 May 2011, 9:32 am by Administrator
  That 5-pat test, as stated in the DOL”s 2010 proposed fiduciary reg, is: “For advice to constitute “investment advice”, an adviser who does not have discretionary authority or control with respect to the purchase or sale of securities or other property for the plan must - 1. [read post]