Search for: "Does 1-41"
Results 3601 - 3620
of 4,619
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
10 Feb 2015, 2:25 pm
The Board should exercise caution before advising parties that it does not wish to hear relevant evidence that the Board considers uninteresting or unhelpful. [read post]
24 Dec 2016, 4:04 am
does the use give rise to consumer deception, take unfair advantage or cause detriment? [read post]
3 Aug 2017, 8:09 am
Perhaps more surprisingly, the President—who is, after all, the pivotal figure in national security policy—does little better, averaging only 2.6 on the one-to-five scale. [read post]
15 Dec 2020, 5:00 am
Amazon.com, No. 41 EM 2020 (Pa. 2020).In the case of Oberdorf v. [read post]
26 Mar 2021, 5:01 am
She reiterated the Biden administration’s whole-of-government approach to ensure “untrusted companies cannot misappropriate and misuse data” and that “U.S. technology does not support China’s … malign activities. [read post]
3 Apr 2013, 5:15 am
Brenner, 41 N.Y.2d 291 (New York Court of Appeals 1977)). [read post]
31 Oct 2015, 12:25 am
Rep. 331, Comberbach, 41 (1686). [read post]
6 May 2021, 4:54 pm
See Luhrmann, When God Talks Back, at 41 (“These evangelical Christians . . . have to pick out the thoughts that count as God’s and . . . do so in a way that does not violate the realistic demands of the everyday world. [read post]
31 Aug 2015, 11:25 am
A literary interlude: Foreign Policy has an excerpt from Sean Naylor’s new book on JSOC, due out September 1. [read post]
20 Nov 2017, 5:00 am
Duffy sponsored in the 114th Congress (H.R. 5311) and which was reported by the House FSC 41-18. [read post]
12 Jul 2018, 1:32 pm
Elizabeth A.C.C. (28 NY3d 1 [2016]), which expansively defined who is a Aparent@ under Domestic Relations Law ' 70. [read post]
12 Jul 2018, 1:32 pm
Elizabeth A.C.C. (28 NY3d 1 [2016]), which expansively defined who is a Aparent@ under Domestic Relations Law ' 70. [read post]
6 Dec 2017, 1:19 pm
Justice O’CONNOR delivered the opinion of the Court. 1 This case requires us to consider to what extent the “fair use” provision of the Copyright Revision Act of 1976, (hereinafter the Copyright Act) 17 U.S.C. [read post]
18 Jul 2014, 11:55 am
July 1, 2010). [read post]
9 Oct 2006, 5:12 pm
The Board granted the General Counsel's motion for partial summary judgment as to the following paragraphs and Appendixes of the compliance specification: Paragraphs 1-5, 6(b), 7(b), 8(b), 9(b)-(e), 10-11, 15-16, 20-21, 34(a), 36-37, 41-42, 46-47, 50(a)-(b), 52-53, 57-58, 62-63, 67-68, 71(a)-(b), 73-74, 78-79, 88-89; Appendixes A, C, E, K, M, O, Q, S, U, W, Y, AA, and EE. [read post]
1 Dec 2020, 12:02 pm
Thus, our silence on paragraphs 41‑69 of our colleague’s reasons should not be taken as tacit approval of their content. [read post]
17 Oct 2009, 12:00 am
The major drawback of Art. 9 does not derive from the rule itself but rather from its restriction to »non-contractual liability «. [read post]
27 Nov 2021, 6:26 am
It pointed out that Service without New York State may be made in the same manner as service is made within the state (see Domestic Relations Law § 75–g[1][a]; CPLR 313). [read post]
2 Apr 2008, 9:13 am
.(-1-). [read post]
22 May 2012, 11:07 pm
[9] Later in his Reasons, in addressing the plaintiff’s opposition to the trial of this action being moved to Hamilton, in part because of his concern that he could not likely get a fair jury trial in Hamilton, the Master went on to say the following: [41] In this case, I see no advantage in choosing a “neutral” site. [read post]
