Search for: "Does 1-43"
Results 3601 - 3620
of 4,490
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
21 Nov 2010, 5:28 pm
International outsourcing does not include a contract between a US company and the US arm of a foreign company when all of the outsourcing work will be done in the United States, because in that situation, no international law issues are likely to be implicated. [read post]
19 Nov 2010, 10:06 am
Rev. 43 (2009)Steven M. [read post]
18 Nov 2010, 6:00 am
And 1/3 of US exports. [read post]
15 Nov 2010, 11:44 am
A primer on the local regulation of genetically modified crops. 43 Suffolk U.L. [read post]
10 Nov 2010, 8:13 pm
See 43 C.F.R. [read post]
8 Nov 2010, 12:19 pm
It now has 6.8 million customers and a loan portfolio of 43 billion rupees ($940 million). [read post]
4 Nov 2010, 10:45 pm
It is true that this marks an important departure from the three relatively recent cases where the House of Lords held that it was not open to a residential occupier, against whom possession was being sought by a local authority, to raise a proportionality argument under article 8: Harrow London Borough Council v Qazi [2003] UKHL 43; [2004] 1 AC 983, Kay v Lambeth London Borough Council [2006] UKHL 10; , and Doherty v Birmingham City Council [2008] UKHL 57. [read post]
3 Nov 2010, 12:02 am
LeBlanc, 2008 BCSC 47, 164 A.C.W.S. (3d) 43 at para. [read post]
31 Oct 2010, 4:42 pm
The interim goal is a lost-time rate of 1. [read post]
29 Oct 2010, 2:35 am
Trust, 43 AD3d 56, 64 (1 sl Dept. 2007) . [read post]
28 Oct 2010, 5:17 am
"Two interesting points:1. [read post]
27 Oct 2010, 11:41 pm
This is s.15: (1) A person (A) discriminates against a disabled person (B) if- (a) A treats B unfavourably because of something arising in consequence of B's disability, and (b) A cannot show that the treatment is a proportionate means of achieving a legitimate aim. (2) Subsection (1) does not apply if A shows that A did not know, and could not reasonably have been expected to know, that B had the disability. [read post]
27 Oct 2010, 11:41 pm
This is s.15: (1) A person (A) discriminates against a disabled person (B) if- (a) A treats B unfavourably because of something arising in consequence of B's disability, and (b) A cannot show that the treatment is a proportionate means of achieving a legitimate aim. (2) Subsection (1) does not apply if A shows that A did not know, and could not reasonably have been expected to know, that B had the disability. [read post]
27 Oct 2010, 11:28 pm
This does not of course mean that these decisions are to be binding in any way upon the UK Courts. [read post]
27 Oct 2010, 8:30 am
”[1] This requirement, also known as the best mode requirement, is in essence a quid pro quo with the inventor. [read post]
26 Oct 2010, 12:33 pm
Note that a §43(a)(1)(B) claim would require Famous Horse to allege (1) “commercial advertising or promotion” and (2) materiality, but no one seems interested in that right now. [read post]
26 Oct 2010, 11:46 am
The email pops into my inbox, I click to open it, I begin reading, and the clock starts: 1 second: John Q. [read post]
26 Oct 2010, 9:17 am
Indeed, foreign nationals arrested in England and Wales already receive a ‘notice of rights’ in one of 43 languages. [read post]
25 Oct 2010, 7:41 am
Davis in a letter dated January 29, 2010, which stated: 1. [read post]
