Search for: "ENGLISH v. STATE" Results 3601 - 3620 of 7,367
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
2 Feb 2022, 9:56 am by Alex Mostaghimi
  In early 2018, the FBI recovered several pages of handwritten English documents resembling an ISIS Sharia law exam. [read post]
8 Jan 2007, 12:02 am
Fun with fundamentals, US-styleRight: the seal of the United States Patent and Trademark OfficeThe IPKat, still behind with his Christmas reading, has at last had the chance to examine Fundamentals of United States Intellectual Property Law: Copyright, Patent, Trademark, the second edition of which was published by Kluwer Law International towards the close of 2006. [read post]
9 Jan 2009, 10:40 am
Beaty, et al.; Republic of Iraq, et al., v. [read post]
17 Jun 2013, 10:10 am by Lyle Denniston
The decision in the case of Arizona v. [read post]
29 Oct 2012, 9:05 am by Mike "No Man" Navarre
Below are observations of the NIMJ volunteer observer at the proceedings in United States v. [read post]
25 May 2015, 7:04 am by Graham Smith
If other State law requires information to be furnished in a conspicuous manner, UETA §8 states that you can furnish the information electronically, but must do so in a conspicuous manner. [read post]
22 Jan 2010, 5:29 am by Sam Hasler
I cannot imagine Indiana courts upholding an oral garden leave agreement.You can find an English example here.Hong Kong's Career Times writes on the importance of good drafting - in terms of English common law - in its Factors in drafting an effective garden leave clause:"What risks are there for the employer if the clause is not properly drafted? [read post]
15 Jul 2017, 5:11 am
The summary stated that the Supreme Court allows Eli Lilly's appeal and holds that Actavis' products directly infringe Eli Lilly's patent in the United Kingdom, France, Italy and Spain. [read post]
25 May 2014, 7:50 am
David gave examples from Kohler Mira v Bristan Group [2013] EWPCC 2, Samsung Electronics (UK) Limited & Another v Apple Inc. [2012] EWHC 1882 and Samsung Electronics (UK) Limited & Another v Apple Inc. [2012] EWCA Civ 1339 where dotted lines were held to indicate transparency. [read post]
1 May 2014, 3:19 pm
However, the other portion of the English-speaking public will not regard ASOS as the acronym for ‘as seen on screen’. [read post]
28 Mar 2009, 3:44 am by Sean Hayes
Constitutional Court of Korea Declares Korean Dictator’s Martial Law Decrees Unconstitutional Liquidated Damages v. [read post]
31 Mar 2017, 1:51 pm by Matthias Weller
Development and implementation of an accompanying communication strategy; V. [read post]