Search for: "ENGLISH v. STATE"
Results 3601 - 3620
of 7,367
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
8 Apr 2015, 4:58 am
In Butler v. [read post]
5 Apr 2015, 8:16 pm
App. 2003); Gorman v. [read post]
2 Apr 2015, 8:27 am
They cite Lord Nicholls in Douglas v Hello 3 (OBG v Allan) as clearly stating that the concept of breach of confidence and misuse of private information “now covers two distinct causes of action”. [read post]
1 Apr 2015, 11:18 am
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York, Second Department. [read post]
1 Apr 2015, 6:53 am
In Armstrong v. [read post]
1 Apr 2015, 3:00 am
Jones denied the International Franchise Association’s (IFA) motion for preliminary injunction in the IFA v. [read post]
31 Mar 2015, 12:00 pm
As re-organized for enactment in the United States, all mandatory requirements have been grouped in this section. [read post]
31 Mar 2015, 5:57 am
In Friday’s Chan v. [read post]
31 Mar 2015, 1:53 am
In Vidal-Hall v, Google Inc ([2015] EWCA Civ 311) the Court of Appeal dismissed Google’s appeal from the decision of Tugendhat J in which he declined to declare that the English court did not have jurisdiction to hear data protection and misuse of private information claims brought against it. [read post]
30 Mar 2015, 10:39 am
Lord Denning in Miller v Jackson Also in the 1970s, English judge Lord Denning wrote one of his most famous judgments in a case that involved a dispute over cricket balls being hit out of a village cricket ground onto a neighboring property. [read post]
30 Mar 2015, 5:15 am
In 2013 it paid US$17 million to settle US state consumer-based actions brought by State AGs. [read post]
30 Mar 2015, 2:46 am
There was still no infringement or passing off so far as SCRABBLE v SCRAMBLE was concerned, however. [read post]
30 Mar 2015, 12:52 am
Bearing this in mind, Case T 378/13 Apple and Pear Australia Ltd and Star Fruits Diffusion v OHIM, Carolus C. [read post]
29 Mar 2015, 1:54 am
There was nothing to suggest that the non-English speaking public understood the meaning of the word element ‘Royal County of Berkshire’ in RCB's mark. [read post]
27 Mar 2015, 8:29 am
Comment This case has provided the Supreme Court with the opportunity to firmly state that the need for “informed consent” is now part of English law. [read post]
26 Mar 2015, 6:33 pm
In 4Front Engineered Solutions, Inc. v. [read post]
26 Mar 2015, 12:57 pm
A familiar sight for lawyersinvolved in TVCatchup suitsITV Broadcasting Limited, ITV 2 Limited, ITV Digital Channels Limited, Channel Four Television Corporation, 4 Ventures Limited, Channel 5 Broadcasting Limited and ITV Studios Limited v TVCatchup Limited (in administration), TVCatchup (UK) Limited and Media Resources Limited (a Mauritian company) [2015] EWCA Civ 204 is the latest development in the long-running copyright litigation saga which is usually known by its shorter name of ITV… [read post]
25 Mar 2015, 5:59 am
There was nothing within the EEOC’s interview notes supporting liability on the part of the growers and no basis for its argument of joint liability (EEOC v. [read post]
24 Mar 2015, 7:38 pm
The WFOE’s English name will be unofficial and is, for the most part, up to you. 9. [read post]
24 Mar 2015, 1:43 pm
Neb., 262 U.S. 390 (1923); Bartels v. [read post]
