Search for: "Germany v. Germany" Results 3601 - 3620 of 4,535
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
5 Apr 2011, 12:38 am by Ben Vernia
Army installations in Germany, for guard hours not actually worked, the Justice Department announced today. [read post]
31 Mar 2011, 8:50 am
KG (Nuremberg, Germany) (represented by: A. von Welser, lawyer) Re: Action brought against the decision of the First Board of Appeal of OHIM of 20 February 2009 (Case R 1879/2007-1), concerning opposition proceedings between Norma Lebensmittelfilialbetrieb GmbH & Co. [read post]
29 Mar 2011, 9:19 pm by Marie Louise
(Kluwer Patent Blog) Prezista (Darunavir) – US: Tibotec files patent infringement complaint against Teva in response to Para IV certification (Patent Docs) Provigil (Modafinil) – US: Apotex’s generic Provigil found not to infringe Cephalon patent (Patent Docs) Seasonique (Levonorgestrel, Ethinyl estradiol) – US: CAFC reversed summary judgment of nonobviousness in Duramed v Watson (Patent Docs) (IPBiz) Simcor (Niacin/Simvastatin) – US: Abbott files patent… [read post]
29 Mar 2011, 4:00 am by Ted Folkman
The case of the day rejoices in the name Johannes Baumgartner Wirtschafts-und-Vermögensberatung GmbH v. [read post]
29 Mar 2011, 3:24 am
Their data was stored on webservers in Germany and Austria but could be accessed via links from elsewhere, including the United Kingdom. [read post]
29 Mar 2011, 2:27 am by gmlevine
Take for example MOWITANIA, the Complainant’s trademark in Mowitania Wendt & Molitor GbR v. [read post]
28 Mar 2011, 11:54 am by Gilles Cuniberti
Bamberski, had Krombach kidnapped in Germany and delivered to French authorities. [read post]
28 Mar 2011, 8:05 am by JB
In a 1941 case called Associated Press v. [read post]
28 Mar 2011, 12:00 am by George M. Wallace
Supreme Court in the affirmative action case of United Steelworkers of America v. [read post]
27 Mar 2011, 11:12 pm by Marie Louise
– Estate of Chet Baker v Sony (Excess Copyright) When a ‘Substantial Payment’ is not enough: Gutter Filter Company L.L.C. v. [read post]
24 Mar 2011, 6:53 am by GuestPost
  Article 8 (1) was engaged in light of the principle that prohibitions on employment can interfere with private life, in particular the ability to develop relations with the outside world (Niemietz v Germany (1993) 16 EHRR 97 and Sidabras v Lithuania (2006) 42 EHRR 6). [read post]