Search for: "Grant v Grant" Results 3601 - 3620 of 104,862
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
27 Nov 2023, 11:15 am by Rose Hughes
Recently, the judge in Sandoz v BMS ([2023] EWCA Civ 472) interpreted G2/21 as being close to an ab initio plausibility standard in line with the UK Supreme Court decision in Warner-Lambert. [read post]
27 Nov 2023, 9:34 am by Franklin C. McRoberts
For interested readers, here are links to recent articles on Ng v Asquared and O’Mahony v Whiston. [read post]
27 Nov 2023, 6:08 am by Eugene Volokh
[But v]iewpoint neutral implementation or enforcement of broad or vague terms such as "promotes or endorses social causes," "harassing," or "offensive terms" may prove difficult. [read post]
27 Nov 2023, 6:02 am by Second Circuit Civil Rights Blog
Under this generous standard, qualified immunity is granted quite frequently. [read post]
27 Nov 2023, 6:00 am by Overhauser Law Offices, LLC
G&G’s argument states that they were granted the exclusive rights to the commercial distribution of the Saul “Canelo” Alvarez v. [read post]
27 Nov 2023, 5:51 am by Elizabeth Goitein
The law grants the government broad authority to collect the communications of non-Americans located abroad without a warrant. [read post]
27 Nov 2023, 4:25 am by Stephen Pitel
A-33.2, which grants the FMAT jurisdiction to make determinations under the Securities Act. [read post]
27 Nov 2023, 4:00 am by Administrator
… The CourtAPPEAL WATCH: Third Party Political Ad Spending Returns to the SCC Docket On November 9, 2023 the Supreme Court of Canada (the “SCC”, or the “Court”) granted the Attorney General of Ontario’s application for leave to appeal [40725] from Working Families Coalition (Canada) Inc. v. [read post]
27 Nov 2023, 2:36 am by Eleonora Rosati
Court of Appeal finds no reason to swipe right in MATCH v MUZMATCH online dating disputeMatch Group, LLC v Muzmatch Ltd [2023] EWCA Civ 454 (April 2023)“MATCH” is hardly a distinctive trade mark for an online dating, aka matchmaking, service. [read post]
27 Nov 2023, 2:15 am by INFORRM
The Defendant was granted permission to amend the Defence and Counterclaim but not to withdraw a previous admission. [read post]
27 Nov 2023, 2:12 am by CMS
In this post, Shabbir Bokhari, a paralegal in the Litigation & Arbitration team at CMS comments on the decision from the Supreme Court in R (AAA and Ors) v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2023] UKSC 42 which was handed down on 15 November 2023. [read post]
27 Nov 2023, 1:25 am by Rose Hughes
The risks of amending the description before grant of a patent can be mitigated (albeit expensively) by filing a divisional application, so as to at least keep an application pending should the granted patent fall down for  added matter. [read post]