Search for: "HALL v. HALL" Results 3601 - 3620 of 5,889
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
17 Dec 2015, 3:46 am by INFORRM
It was argued that there had to be some damage which was limited to distress or hurt to feelings, which could be proved before damages were awarded, citing Vidal-Hall v Google Inc. [read post]
10 Jan 2024, 8:05 pm by John Elwood
Then the court in Hall v. [read post]
30 Sep 2014, 5:06 pm by INFORRM
 An application for permission to appeal against a decision of Tugendhat J [2014] EWHC 1339 (QB) Vidal-Hall v Google Inc, Appeal on 8 or 9 December 2014, 5 hour time estimate. [read post]
4 Oct 2015, 4:03 am by INFORRM
– Sophie Stalla-Bourdillon Ireland: Full Breach Damages in data protection cases, the impact of Vidal-Hall on Collins v FBD – Eoin O’Dell The Labour Party “purge” and social media privacy – Paul Bernal Case Law: Starr v Ward, Justification defence succeeds in Freddie Starr’s “groping” libel claim Case Law, Strasbourg: Morar v Romania, Criminal defamation and journalistic bad faith – Joseph Williams South… [read post]
29 Apr 2018, 4:16 pm by INFORRM
Rulings               IPSO has published a series of rulings and a Resolution Statement from the Complaints Committee: Resolution Statement 02051-18 A woman v That’s Life – Resolved via IPSO mediation involving Principles 1 (Accuracy), 2 (Privacy), 7 (Children in sex cases) and 11 (Victims of sexual assault) 18693-17 Ward v Mail on Sunday – no breach of Principle 1 (Accuracy) after… [read post]
1 Mar 2015, 4:18 pm by INFORRM
  The Court did not follow the case of Hall v. [read post]
20 Apr 2018, 1:49 am by INFORRM
  However, such an approach would have potentially been problematic as, unlike in Vidal-Hall v Google [2015] EWCA 311 (where the Court of Appeal disapplied section 13(2) of the DPA), there was no real discrepancy between the EU parent legislation (Directive 95/46/EC/the Data Protection Directive) and the domestic legislation. [read post]
14 Apr 2022, 10:51 am by Tony Bui
A recent Superior Court decision highlights the dangers of poor meeting notices – these meetings were essentially dead before they hit the ground. 2030516 Ontario Inc. v. [read post]