Search for: "HARRIS v. STATE"
Results 3601 - 3620
of 5,168
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
23 Sep 2009, 10:48 am
”); Harris v. [read post]
1 Aug 2024, 2:43 pm
I despise Cooper v. [read post]
27 Jun 2022, 9:00 pm
The Supreme Court upheld the action.When in the now-celebrated case of Marbury v. [read post]
21 Mar 2025, 9:47 am
These decisions include Wong Kim Ark, affirming birthright citizenship for all born in the United States and holding that Elk v. [read post]
17 Mar 2009, 8:12 pm
” Calder v. [read post]
11 May 2011, 9:41 am
His attorneys are now urging the court to expand their ruling in Graham v. [read post]
29 Jun 2015, 5:10 am
In EEOC v. [read post]
13 Dec 2024, 5:00 am
Such service was not in accordance with the mandates of the Pennsylvania Rules of Civil Procedure, which requires service on in-state defendants by a Sheriff’s Department. [read post]
13 Dec 2011, 10:52 am
Garcia v. [read post]
1 Mar 2009, 9:45 pm
Gertrude denies Harry a job. [read post]
11 Sep 2011, 8:58 pm
Gertrude denies Harry a job. [read post]
25 May 2008, 11:50 am
Gertrude denies Harry a job. [read post]
10 Jun 2019, 1:40 pm
Although the postal service has been declared a non-person, today’s decision cannot detract from the federal agency’s heartwarming role in the landmark case of State of New York v. [read post]
7 Dec 2023, 6:48 am
In Kennedy v. [read post]
29 Jun 2012, 9:06 am
Harris County Appraisal District, No. 11-0400 (DB) (per curiam). [read post]
4 Mar 2021, 12:48 pm
State v. [read post]
29 Jun 2017, 7:03 am
Harris, 352 N.C. 77 (2000); Kroh v. [read post]
16 Aug 2024, 3:00 am
All seven state ballot measures considered following the Supreme Court’s 2022 Dobbs v. [read post]
History Shows the Supreme Court Knows How to Move Quickly, as it Should With the Trump Immunity Case
22 Apr 2024, 5:50 am
The appeal concerning the validity of the subpoena, United States v. [read post]
25 Jun 2012, 8:45 am
In a widely read Atlantic piece, James Fallows just accused the five Justices--Kennedy, Scalia, Thomas, Roberts, and Alito--of being part of a judicial "coup" running back to Bush v. [read post]
