Search for: "In re A. V."
Results 3601 - 3620
of 62,914
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
18 Mar 2023, 8:04 pm
The decision overturned Roe v. [read post]
18 Mar 2023, 5:34 pm
In re C.C., 2023 VT 16. [read post]
18 Mar 2023, 1:15 pm
For example, in the 1981 case of Stone v. [read post]
17 Mar 2023, 2:45 pm
A list of all petitions we’re watching is available here. [read post]
17 Mar 2023, 11:57 am
From Judge Don Willett's opinion yesterday in Fisher v. [read post]
17 Mar 2023, 9:49 am
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit ruled in Splestoser v. [read post]
17 Mar 2023, 9:08 am
The Nation disagrees, arguing that an APA claim to require the government to assess and act on the Nation’s water needs and rights is not a claim to re-open Arizona v. [read post]
17 Mar 2023, 8:44 am
So, if you're looking to expand your legal knowledge and stay up-to-date on the latest developments, be sure to check out our selection of podcasts featuring Moritz law faculty members.* And if you’re interested in taking a deeper dive into the world of legal podcasts, check out the Moritz Law Library’s Podcasts & Current Awareness library guide at https://go.osu.edu/CYAU. [read post]
17 Mar 2023, 8:25 am
More about us: a recent amicus brief filed by the International Center for Law & Economics and 20 scholars of antitrust law and economics (including your humble scribe, but also, and not for nothin’, a Nobel laureate), explains some of the pro-competitive potential of such agreements, both generally and with a focus on a specific case, Delandes v. [read post]
17 Mar 2023, 8:08 am
An example is Ahn v. [read post]
17 Mar 2023, 6:14 am
It found that in the months preceding the election, the Republican National Committee and Trump re-election campaign staff were repeatedly and consistently on message at the same moments as then-President Trump’s tweets, which suggested ‘an institutionalized rather than individual disinformation campaign’ regarding mail-in voter fraud. [read post]
17 Mar 2023, 1:29 am
La demanda se planteó ante el Juzgado contencioso-administrativo por el procedimiento especial de tutela de derechos fundamentales para combatir la vía de hecho, que fue desestimada por sentencia, que a su vez fue confirmada por la sala contencioso-administrativa del Tribunal Superior de Justicia. [read post]
16 Mar 2023, 4:34 pm
Cher v. [read post]
16 Mar 2023, 4:16 pm
In Twitter v. [read post]
16 Mar 2023, 11:40 am
And now that Dobbs v. [read post]
16 Mar 2023, 8:31 am
Harbor Breeze Corp. v. [read post]
15 Mar 2023, 5:06 pm
Helix Energy Solution Group, Inc. v. [read post]
15 Mar 2023, 10:26 am
In KSR Int’l Co. v. [read post]
15 Mar 2023, 4:30 am
As Justice Souter wrote for a unanimous Supreme Court in Campbell v. [read post]
15 Mar 2023, 2:40 am
The issue has also widened because the DOJ and the same state AGs as in the litigation that was originally started by Epic brought a motion for sanctions in the United States et al. v. [read post]
